Don't forget, you can log in with your Play.net account
User talk:CARAAMON/Archive
You forgot to say all that LOUDLY. :-)
Don't suppose you know why RankMap1's table is messed up? -- Taral 00:05, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- Lemmie look into it.Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi 00:16, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- Fixed, looks like I typoed when I was messing with one of the core templates. Bah!Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi 00:24, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- Thanks! -- Taral 14:06, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
Congrats!
Hey, Caraamon, congrats on being made admin! I like what you did with {{spell}} and {{item}} templates, automatically adding {{incomplete}} when the infobox is missing certain info, that's nicely coded. I made a few tweaks to {{incomplete}} to make it look better, hope you agree with my choices. --Farman 10:56, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
reply posted on my talk page
Hi Caraamon, I responded to your notice about the style manual on my talk page. --Farman 14:39, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
Alicia Crowther
Hi, I see you've moved the Alicia Crowther article from "Alicia" to "Alicia Crowther". How to name articles has been an ongoing concern for the Elanthiedia which has received much discussion in the past. A while back, however, everybody was able to agree on the first-name-only format (with a few exceptions) enough that it has been entered into the Elanthipedia:Manual_of_Style. Hope that helps. --Basselope 12:59, 29 April 2008 (CDT)
- I just noticed the discussion over at Elanthipedia:Manual of Style/new. --Basselope 13:20, 29 April 2008 (CDT)
Template error
It appears that editing one of the templates involved in the Shop templates broke the display for shop pages. Berolt's Dry Goods
-Glimmereyes 08:19, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
- I'm trying to fix this. I *think* I know what's going on, but we'll see. I think Caraamon is out of town or at least away from Elanthipedia for a while with RL stuff.--Naeya (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
- Edit: Nevermind, he made some edits yesterday. I think I'll leave it to him, since it's his baby now! For some reason it's not parsing the {{!}} correctly which is messing up the tables.--Naeya (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
- Okay, this is why I want to strangle whoever created this wikicode thing..... one freaking lose line called all those problems. sigh. It's fixed. -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi 11:47, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
Not sure what you did to the spell/enchante templates, but there's a weird line showing up as "{{#ifeq:<guild>|bard|" (where guild is that spell's guild) below every spell box now. Bards are fine --Thilan 10:18, 11 July 2008 (CDT)
The change you made to Roopardua seems to have broken the page's NPC infobox. Tried fixing it but nothing's happening. --Thilan 23:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- The change that broke it was actually on the NPC Template, what happend was he added "filler" to the start of the template, and this filler interupted the wiki parsing of {| which must be at the start of its own line. --Callek 04:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Forms
Take a look at Form:Item. I'll be making one of those forms for all the item templates and other popular templates (like integrating all the shop templates into one form as well. Let me know if there's anything I missed. I haven't added all the worn slots yet. Moving tomorrow so won't be able to get back to it for about a week (read: whenever they setup our cable).--Naeya (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
- Great idea, I'd volunteer to work on it too, but I have so much on my plate right now, I think I'm going to scream. -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 19:20, 31 May 2008 (CDT)
Item
See topic Template_talk:Item regarding notes. Thanks!--Naeya (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2008 (CDT)
Cenedora
Hey Caraamon.
Cenedora is not a ring bearer. He was for about 3 days before I rerolled him and completely changed his character concept, he's not even in the same Elven Clan as before - I've destroyed the ring. Can you take him off the list?
SMW Namespace FIXED
Hey! I fixed the namespace problem! However, everything that has been moved to one of the new namespaces needs to be moved back to the main namespace, then moved back to their custom namespace again. The factbox shows up correctly in the new namespaces once this has been done. It's a little tedious, but fixes our problem! I hope you haven't moved too many articles to the new namespaces yet! Let me know if you want help fixing all the affected pages.--Naeya (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2008 (CDT) Hmm or I could be wrong. I've looked at a few more of them and they seem to be fine without the little switcheroo move thing. Let me know if you notice any problems.--Naeya (talk) 19:33, 19 June 2008 (CDT)
- By all the annoyingly silent gods, that's great. Thank you. Now if you're bored, maybe you might want to track down why the Forms explode if I try to activate autocomplete on source fields? If not, no biggie, it's not a high priority.-Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 19:35, 19 June 2008 (CDT)
Discussion
Heya, we needta chat about the direction of Items. Please send me an IM (EmpathNaeya) when you can.--Naeya (talk) 09:08, 27 June 2008 (CDT)
Spell Template
Could you take a look at my note here when you get time, please?--Naeya (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2008 (CDT)
Bestiary Level List problem
Since you're better at picking these things apart than I am, could you take a look at the small error that's occuring on the bestiary level list when you have time? Thanks!--Naeya (talk) 09:33, 31 July 2008 (CDT)
Enchantes Pages
I'm not sure if you set up the templates for the spell pages, but I can't seem to find a way to unmark an article as complete. All of the Bard enchante pages are complete as of now - I would like to 'unincomplete' them if possible. Thanks! --Slowhubb 20:20, 6 October 2008 (CDT)
Update: Alright, I found the issue: The enchante template conversion broke something. For whatever reason, it's not tracking the variables necessary for completion correctly. For instance, I can have the enchante play times, song form, etc blank because the spell template doesn't track those fields to determine whether or not the article is complete.
I went through and updated most of the enchante pages to complete them, but it had the unintended effect of completing non-complete pages. Any ideas? I don't think I can edit the template myself to fix the issue.
Thanks! --Slowhubb 23:21, 12 October 2008 (CDT)
- I'll look into it when I have a moment. My plate is a bit full, but I'll get on it "soon." -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 23:42, 12 October 2008 (CDT)
Rawr
check it out, factbox is back. --Naeya (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2008 (CDT)
Ask syntax
Have you used <ask> anywhere? If so I need to make some code changes. This was something that has to do with the SMW upgrade. It might be easier to change them all to #ask - (more info - SMF site--Naeya (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Nope, *I* haven't. I uses #ask. Dunno if anyone else has. -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 21:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey, on Elemental Pathways
done, gave pathway perceive it's own page for future additions too -Powerhaus 10:26, 30 January 2009
hmm ok, i'll work on it. Eh Barrage kind of is and isn't, it's not like the others cause it's an actual attack rather than a state of mind, but shows up on our pathway list and uses 'mental reserve' that only gets drained and used by pathway stuff, i'll probably just put a See barrage or something. thanks
Powerhaus23:40, 29 January 2009
noticed there's 2 pathways pages, one with spoilers, and one that's a mess. Should the info just be copied over the the messy one, and delete the spoilers and leave a link to the pathway spoilers page? Also I don't think the whole Spell Form is needed, since other than barrage they don't include any spell effects? Also was wondering if I should move Defense Pathway spoilers from Discussion to the acual page since it's been awhile now. Finally, should Barrage be included with the pathways with just a link to the Barrage entry?
Powerhaus 11:00, 29 January 2009
Hi
If you could get with me in an email that would be fantastic. idonraiders@inbox.com or idonswebmaster@imseeingatherapist.com either works. thanks so much.--WebmasterIdonraiders 00:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
please note I've responded to Fenance's claims as best I could and also took your advice and remained civil :) Thanks for taking the time to hear both sides and Have a great night. --WebmasterIdonraiders 00:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Titles
I've been changing some of the Title pages to use the TitleReq templates, rather than the extra pipes in the Title template, as I thought the TitleReq was the way things were going, but then I saw what you'd done with Barbarian Titles, so am thinking I may need to undo the changes I've made. Or, possibly use both styles so that TitleAsk and the individual Title pages both work? Thoughts? FuIru 20:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the long wait, I've been having internet problems. Use TitleAsk for the category pages and use the forms to do the individual title pages. The form knows how to process it correctly.Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 03:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
As you probably noticed I updated the titleAsk stuff to "work better" including pretty name, and linking etc. (we may want to update css/formatting on the "more" link... no time atm). I also added a TODO page to help with getting it all done (and caught up)! Also of note is the missing property, which I added generically to do things like what you just did today (add it to other templates), so thanks on that! --Callek 05:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep I saw and it looks good to me. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 06:55, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Replied to you on my talk page. again --Callek 20:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
hey, any idea what is up with the Title ToDo page, it refs the missing::TitleReq and still shows many pages that no longer have that. Even its "more" link shows that. Nearly the whole first results have that problem. Is it a Semantic bug, a function of how elanthipedia is cached, or did I do some mistake? If a semantic MW bug I can surely dig and attempt to fix stuff, but it may take a bit of work. (my best guess is its a factor of Semantic MW + parser functions together, the #if stuff) --Callek 03:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's a caching issue as far as I can tell. Basically, until the page is purged after the semantics change, it won't send it to the search engine properly. At least that's the issue I keep running into. If that doesn't work.... lemmie know and I'll poke into it. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 07:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I've found a fix. Purging (i.e. refreshing) isn't enough, you actually have to do a no-change edit and save for it to be updated correctly. I suspect it has to do with the fact they were shifted namespaces, but I'm not sure of the details. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 07:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yea, purging in and of itself did not work (I can also purge :-) ) which is where I was confused. --Callek 15:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, and looks like it STILL did not update that ToDo page (I see a few that still shouldn't be there)... unless you mean purge/blank-save on the Title:* pages themselves. --Callek 15:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep. Gotta resave each individual title page. Why? Damned if I know. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 19:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, and looks like it STILL did not update that ToDo page (I see a few that still shouldn't be there)... unless you mean purge/blank-save on the Title:* pages themselves. --Callek 15:30, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yea, purging in and of itself did not work (I can also purge :-) ) which is where I was confused. --Callek 15:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Couple things: How do we calculate a diff for a title that only requires a stat like Title:Actor? And how do we calculate a diff for a guild title requiring a skill that isn't required for the guild like Title:Impresario? Had a couple more that have slipped my mind at the moment, but I'll let you know. I've been gradually working through the categories, finished Trader, Performer, Lore and Criminal, working on Survivals and up next are Thief and the other general categories. I saw you were doing the combat ones this morning so I'll leave those to you if you want. Thanks, Azhag 02:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, what I do is that I ignore any skill that isn't required (no choice), and if it's a pure stat title, I make an arbitrary guess based on what I know of the given guild. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 02:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Gem Selling
Hey can you proofread and copy-edit Selling_Gem_Pouches for me, I'm not sure if that is clear enough. But I just wanted to write an article on it from all my times explaining the methods to newcomers in the gemshop in crossing! (I plan on writing a page on the numbers, and one "for traders" to refer to eventually) --Callek 18:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how to better word it at the moment, but tieing a pouch actually creates 2 items, not one. It is one for the pouch itself, and one for all the gems inside. --Callek 21:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
response
I responded on my user talk. As far as the changes go, I've provided proof but honestly, they're about things that are general reputation. It's well known, and Ragran is attempting to hide it. As someone who works full time on wikis, I am quite averse to people trying to whitewash their own articles that read like puff-pieces. Fenance 22:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Ranik Maps
I just made a change to the map infobox, without first verifying that this is something we want. Revert if you think we need to either create stubs with template for shops red-linked from maps. Or if you feel that the way I did this is not wanted (i.e. fest shops showing up, needing to add new shop pages for the links to even appear, or shops from sub-maps not appearing -- i.e. Trader shop is not on Ranik's Map 1). --Callek 04:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Inkhorne
Why drop Map4 and add Leucro's, I'm still not sure where there is the Inhorne --Callek 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Unless they were moved to map4 with the west gate update, the only palce I've ever seen inkhorns was in with leucros. They're rare....assuming they haven't been removed in the year or so since I was last there. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 19:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- They were added to Hunting Preserve, yes. But they are definitely not on the Map for Leucro's... so thats a "MapError" to add there... but we need the Map4 added back (I'm at work, so please do it for me) ;-) --Callek 19:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Creature, NPC's, Shop Owners, and Maps
A few thoughts I am having... The creature pages are unwieldy and unable to be easily modified via the Form.
I suggest one of us come up with a new layout there (that the current template(s) can fit into without much difficulty (given the large number of critter pages). Preferrably [imo] one that has majority of text along left side of page (rather than needing to move from the float: left stuff)
I was thinking something like a top-of-page header that has all the info, and the picture along the right side. But no idea how to work that. This will also allow us to have the map list specified in numbers alone on the creature pages in future (so we don't need to rely on people using {{rmap}})
As far as NPC's, I was thinking of adjusting the template/form to allow pre-title, last name, and post-title (even affil?) entries. And then we can utilize that info on other pages we link from (such as Maps). This would negate the need to alt-specify MANY of the NPC's. (and could be used for player characters too).
Shopowners I was considering removing from the "Noteable People" list, unless they have another |type| associated with their NPC page. reasoning being in some cities there are MANY shops, and as the shops are already listed there is probably no need to also list their owners on the main map page.
I have not investigated any of these thoughts too heavily yet, but was wondering your opinion.
--Callek 17:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- I completely agree about the critter stuff. Lemmie give it some thought and I'll do some mock ups. Personally, I prefer right lined stuff, though.
- Either way, some mockups would be good (I was going to just do some mockups last night, but got waaay too tired) --Callek 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I was more thinking an entire redesign of the page, but based on ThunderRams alone, I think we can go with this... it should work just fine for now. And we can actually let a Form help I think. --Callek 22:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Either way, some mockups would be good (I was going to just do some mockups last night, but got waaay too tired) --Callek 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- NPC/Shopkeepers.... the problem is that if you exclude shopkeepers, who else do you exclude? What criteria do we set for "important" people? As for alt names, just change the "names" section to whatever you want displayed, and use that as the display name.... actually, lemmie set that up as a tag. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 18:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- As far as "important" people, I was thinking shopkeepers not listed unless they have/had another role as something else. As in, in general we won't list Grisgonda on crossing (he owns the gemshop) but if the NPC of grisgonda caught and killed Grishnok, then we'd have him listed as another type of npc as well. Basically I'm just thinking to exclude shopkeeps from the Map List who are not also listed as another type. (The shops themselves are still listed, and I still intend we include the shopkeeps on the wiki). --Callek 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)