Talk:Holidays: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anyone know how to take the section numbers out of the Table of Contents? It would make that Table of Contents much easier to read and more useful. --[[User:Kraelyst|Kraelyst]] 07:06, 5 November 2007 (CST) |
Does anyone know how to take the section numbers out of the Table of Contents? It would make that Table of Contents much easier to read and more useful. --[[User:Kraelyst|Kraelyst]] 07:06, 5 November 2007 (CST) |
||
:I don't think it's possible to remove the section numbers. However, would this page look better as a table? Would solve the TOC problem.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 14:06, 6 December 2007 (CST) |
:I don't think it's possible to remove the section numbers. However, would this page look better as a table? Would solve the TOC problem.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 14:06, 6 December 2007 (CST)<br> |
||
<br> |
|||
I have noted some minor inconsistencies in the dates listed for certain holidays. I will be attempting to reconcile these, prioritizing information found in {{com|Recall|Recall Holiday}} and in-game books. Unfortunately, even the canon sources are not entirely consistent in how they number days of the year. Often they number the days 1-400, but sometimes they seem to be using the 0 day convention (numbering the days 0-399, as shown in the {{com|Time}} output). In a few other cases, the dates given fall in the middle of the holy week. See [[Elanthian_calendar_charts#The_400_Days_of_the_Year|Elanthian calendar charts]] for examples. --[[User:ISHARON|ISHARON]] ([[User talk:ISHARON|talk]]) 20:36, 16 August 2015 (CDT) |
|||
:There are two ways I can go about doing this. I can either make a table, similar to what I have done on the [[Elanthian calendar charts]], or I can just try to clean up the current style. Thoughts? --[[User:ISHARON|ISHARON]] ([[User talk:ISHARON|talk]]) 20:36, 16 August 2015 (CDT) |
|||
:I would also like feedback on which numbering convention we will use so that it's applied consistently. --[[User:ISHARON|ISHARON]] ([[User talk:ISHARON|talk]]) |
Latest revision as of 19:38, 16 August 2015
Does anyone know how to take the section numbers out of the Table of Contents? It would make that Table of Contents much easier to read and more useful. --Kraelyst 07:06, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- I don't think it's possible to remove the section numbers. However, would this page look better as a table? Would solve the TOC problem.--Naeya (talk) 14:06, 6 December 2007 (CST)
I have noted some minor inconsistencies in the dates listed for certain holidays. I will be attempting to reconcile these, prioritizing information found in RECALL HOLIDAY and in-game books. Unfortunately, even the canon sources are not entirely consistent in how they number days of the year. Often they number the days 1-400, but sometimes they seem to be using the 0 day convention (numbering the days 0-399, as shown in the TIME output). In a few other cases, the dates given fall in the middle of the holy week. See Elanthian calendar charts for examples. --ISHARON (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2015 (CDT)
- There are two ways I can go about doing this. I can either make a table, similar to what I have done on the Elanthian calendar charts, or I can just try to clean up the current style. Thoughts? --ISHARON (talk) 20:36, 16 August 2015 (CDT)
- I would also like feedback on which numbering convention we will use so that it's applied consistently. --ISHARON (talk)