Category talk:Articles that might reveal secrets: Difference between revisions
(New page: ==Murrula's Flames== The reqs are listed in the Murrula's Flames article, but not revealed on the [http://www.play.net/dr/info/spells/spelllist.asp?guild=6&name=Cleric#Divine%20Interve...) |
m (CARAAMON moved page Category talk:Articles that Might Reveal Secrets to Category talk:Articles that might reveal secrets) |
||
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Murrula's Flames== |
==Murrula's Flames== |
||
The reqs are listed in the [[Murrula's Flames]] article, but not revealed on the [http://www.play.net/dr/info/spells/spelllist.asp?guild=6&name=Cleric#Divine%20Intervention DR Spell page]. I don't play a cleric so I don't know. Is that supposed to be secret? --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 21:51, 6 May 2007 (CDT) |
The reqs are listed in the [[Murrula's Flames]] article, but not revealed on the [http://www.play.net/dr/info/spells/spelllist.asp?guild=6&name=Cleric#Divine%20Intervention DR Spell page]. I don't play a cleric so I don't know. Is that supposed to be secret? --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 21:51, 6 May 2007 (CDT) |
||
:For both Murrula's Flames and Resurrection; the prereqs and the spells themselves are not secrets, only their quests are.--[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 05:32, 17 June 2007 (CDT) |
|||
== Resurrection == |
|||
Same as for Murrula's Flames. DR Spell page shows req's as secret. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 22:16, 6 May 2007 (CDT) |
|||
== War Mage Pathways == |
|||
The article contains what appear to be spoilers for the quests involved to attain those abilities. Is it fair to say that's still secret? --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 11:40, 21 May 2007 (CDT) |
|||
:All quest information on both [[Aethereal Pathways]] and [[Familiars]] pages should be removed.--[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 07:47, 26 November 2007 (CST) |
|||
The barrage ability or pathways themselves and what they do are not secret. If an article was written about them with the spoilers linked on a marked secret page is that acceptable?--[[User:Maje|Maje]] 19:53, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
:That would probably work. Make sure that it is clearly marked that they will link to spoilers. We'll then link to thate page instead of the current one...Let me set something up.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 19:52, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
I moved the current page to [[Aethereal Pathways (Walkthroughs)]]. Feel free to make up a basic page on the original name [[Aethereal Pathways]] and link to the new page from it.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 20:17, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
== [[Barbarian]] == |
|||
I am unsure if "Whirlwind" Req's are/should be considered secret. --[[User:Callek|Callek]] 23:56, 23 May 2007 (CDT) |
|||
:Players have posted on the barbarian boards the reqs. It is pretty common knowledge around the barbarian guild what the reqs are. I really wouldn't consider it a secret. --[[User:Brablo|Brablo]] 21:42, 22 Oct 2007 (CDT) |
|||
== Spoiler Alert == |
|||
Do we maybe want to change/edit the SHH Disclaimer to something like Spoiler Alert - as that might also be a useful tag for some of the RP info being filled out on players and NPCs (its already done with in game puzzles/quests). Or does one of these already exist? I'd like for people who are participating in puzzles or plots who come here looking for generic info but don't want to get "all the answers" to have some kinda warning that the article/info is very complete - giving a lot more info than just general hints and vague glossings.--[[User:Ahnoui|Ahnoui]] 01:47, 5 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
:I have just created the {{tlink|spoilers}} template as suggested. But we should keep {{tlink|CheckForSecret}} too since it serves a useful purpose, ie. marking articles that contain secrets, that shouldn't contain them. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 10:19, 5 December 2007 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 22:25, 20 December 2014
Murrula's Flames
The reqs are listed in the Murrula's Flames article, but not revealed on the DR Spell page. I don't play a cleric so I don't know. Is that supposed to be secret? --Farman 21:51, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
- For both Murrula's Flames and Resurrection; the prereqs and the spells themselves are not secrets, only their quests are.--Aetherie 05:32, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
Resurrection
Same as for Murrula's Flames. DR Spell page shows req's as secret. --Farman 22:16, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
War Mage Pathways
The article contains what appear to be spoilers for the quests involved to attain those abilities. Is it fair to say that's still secret? --Farman 11:40, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
- All quest information on both Aethereal Pathways and Familiars pages should be removed.--Aetherie 07:47, 26 November 2007 (CST)
The barrage ability or pathways themselves and what they do are not secret. If an article was written about them with the spoilers linked on a marked secret page is that acceptable?--Maje 19:53, 2 December 2007 (CST)
- That would probably work. Make sure that it is clearly marked that they will link to spoilers. We'll then link to thate page instead of the current one...Let me set something up.--Naeya (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2007 (CST)
I moved the current page to Aethereal Pathways (Walkthroughs). Feel free to make up a basic page on the original name Aethereal Pathways and link to the new page from it.--Naeya (talk) 20:17, 2 December 2007 (CST)
Barbarian
I am unsure if "Whirlwind" Req's are/should be considered secret. --Callek 23:56, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
- Players have posted on the barbarian boards the reqs. It is pretty common knowledge around the barbarian guild what the reqs are. I really wouldn't consider it a secret. --Brablo 21:42, 22 Oct 2007 (CDT)
Spoiler Alert
Do we maybe want to change/edit the SHH Disclaimer to something like Spoiler Alert - as that might also be a useful tag for some of the RP info being filled out on players and NPCs (its already done with in game puzzles/quests). Or does one of these already exist? I'd like for people who are participating in puzzles or plots who come here looking for generic info but don't want to get "all the answers" to have some kinda warning that the article/info is very complete - giving a lot more info than just general hints and vague glossings.--Ahnoui 01:47, 5 December 2007 (CST)
- I have just created the {{spoilers}} template as suggested. But we should keep {{CheckForSecret}} too since it serves a useful purpose, ie. marking articles that contain secrets, that shouldn't contain them. --Farman 10:19, 5 December 2007 (CST)