Template talk:ShopItem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Template:!) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Articles== |
|||
Are "a pair of" or "a set of" counted as articles?--[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 00:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== Template:! == |
== Template:! == |
||
Template:ShopItem and Template:! don't appear to be play well together. The links work, but the display on the shop pages is messed up.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes|Glimmereyes]] 11:05, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
Template:ShopItem and Template:! don't appear to be play well together. The links work, but the display on the shop pages is messed up.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes|Glimmereyes]] 11:05, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
||
:Hmm, where are they not behaving? IE gimme a link to a shop--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 11:16, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
|||
::[[Milgrym's Weapons]]'s has a couple of the display errors. An example is the dagger which displays as "dagger|Dagger (1)|Dagger". Not sure where it's grabbing the first part, but the second and third parts look like it's not properly handling the page name and the display name.<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes|Glimmereyes]] 11:24, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
|||
:Ahhh ok... yeah ugh. At least it's linking to the correct page for now, so it's just a display error. My eyes cross when I look at these templates that Caraamon has created, so might get him to take a look.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 11:26, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
|||
::Upon further investigation, looks like Caraamon snuck a different way to handle such links, but didn't update [[Category talk:Shops]]. I say we hang him up by his toes for not updating all the documentation! [[Template:ShopItem]] mentions the Name field and it doesn't break the links<br>-[[User:Glimmereyes|Glimmereyes]] 11:32, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
|||
::..... Why does the shops category even have documentation?!? And how was I supposed to know? I document my templates, I don't go searching for documentation lodged in the equivalent of someone's left big toe. :P -[[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 20:45, 2 July 2008 (CDT) |
|||
<!-- |
|||
Storing this in here in case I want to use it later. -Caraamon |
|||
<includeonly>|[[{{#switch:{{{smw}}}|n=|shop sells::}}{{#switch:{{lc:{{{t|}}}}}|n=|w=Weapon:|a=Armor:|s=Shield:|i|Item:}}{{ucfirst:{{lc:{{{1}}}}}}}{{#if:{{{name|}}}|{{!}}{{{name}}}|{{!}}{{{1}}}}}]]{{#If:{{{note|}}}| - ''{{{note}}}''}}||{{{2|?}}} |
|||
--> |
|||
== Making REDLINKS go to correct form! == |
|||
Caraamon, instead of breaking things, I wanted to ask if you could take a look at the following link and see if it's possible to add to this template, to get the Redlinks to open the correct form from the shopping pages. |
|||
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_Forms#Pointing_red_links_to_.27add_data.27_form |
|||
Thanks! --[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 09:59, 18 August 2008 (CDT) |
|||
:Ya, I'll look into it. -[[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 18:50, 18 August 2008 (CDT) |
|||
:Is our MediWiki version less than 1.13? If so, I need you to make the alteration listed [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/MediaWiki_red_links_code_change here]. If it is greater, something funky is going on and I'll need to dig around after I get back from work. -[[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 19:19, 18 August 2008 (CDT) |
|||
::We have Version 1.11.2 as seen on [[Special:Version]]. I'll take a look at the changes. That's really weird that we'd have to make code changes...--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 10:13, 20 August 2008 (CDT) |
|||
::Ok I've made the code changes to Linker.php. See if it'll work now.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 10:15, 20 August 2008 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:18, 15 May 2010
Articles
Are "a pair of" or "a set of" counted as articles?--Isharon 00:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Template:!
Template:ShopItem and Template:! don't appear to be play well together. The links work, but the display on the shop pages is messed up.
-Glimmereyes 11:05, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- Hmm, where are they not behaving? IE gimme a link to a shop--Naeya (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- Milgrym's Weapons's has a couple of the display errors. An example is the dagger which displays as "dagger|Dagger (1)|Dagger". Not sure where it's grabbing the first part, but the second and third parts look like it's not properly handling the page name and the display name.
-Glimmereyes 11:24, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- Milgrym's Weapons's has a couple of the display errors. An example is the dagger which displays as "dagger|Dagger (1)|Dagger". Not sure where it's grabbing the first part, but the second and third parts look like it's not properly handling the page name and the display name.
- Ahhh ok... yeah ugh. At least it's linking to the correct page for now, so it's just a display error. My eyes cross when I look at these templates that Caraamon has created, so might get him to take a look.--Naeya (talk) 11:26, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- Upon further investigation, looks like Caraamon snuck a different way to handle such links, but didn't update Category talk:Shops. I say we hang him up by his toes for not updating all the documentation! Template:ShopItem mentions the Name field and it doesn't break the links
-Glimmereyes 11:32, 2 July 2008 (CDT) - ..... Why does the shops category even have documentation?!? And how was I supposed to know? I document my templates, I don't go searching for documentation lodged in the equivalent of someone's left big toe. :P -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 20:45, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- Upon further investigation, looks like Caraamon snuck a different way to handle such links, but didn't update Category talk:Shops. I say we hang him up by his toes for not updating all the documentation! Template:ShopItem mentions the Name field and it doesn't break the links
Making REDLINKS go to correct form!
Caraamon, instead of breaking things, I wanted to ask if you could take a look at the following link and see if it's possible to add to this template, to get the Redlinks to open the correct form from the shopping pages.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_Forms#Pointing_red_links_to_.27add_data.27_form
Thanks! --Naeya (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2008 (CDT)
- Ya, I'll look into it. -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 18:50, 18 August 2008 (CDT)
- Is our MediWiki version less than 1.13? If so, I need you to make the alteration listed here. If it is greater, something funky is going on and I'll need to dig around after I get back from work. -Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 19:19, 18 August 2008 (CDT)
- We have Version 1.11.2 as seen on Special:Version. I'll take a look at the changes. That's really weird that we'd have to make code changes...--Naeya (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2008 (CDT)
- Ok I've made the code changes to Linker.php. See if it'll work now.--Naeya (talk) 10:15, 20 August 2008 (CDT)