Post:Consent and Accuse - 4/7/2011 - 11:05:22

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 11:17, 7 April 2011 by ISHARON (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Post |a=DR-RAESH |t=Re: Consent and Accuse |d=4/7/2011 11:05:22 AM |n=21890 |f=The Social Side of DragonRealms (43) \ Conflicts - Strictly Out of Character (7) |c=r |p=''>>All …')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Re: Consent and Accuse · on 4/7/2011 11:05:22 AM 21890
>>All of these are very good reasons for playing a necromancer. None of the reasons above involve pvp.

No one said that there weren't plenty of reasons to want to play a necromancer aside from PvP. Of course there are.

The issue is that PvP is a fundamental part of being a necromancer.

Rolling a necromancer for those reasons while you dislike conflict would be like wanting to play a spellcaster who was also good with weapons and deciding to roll a barbarian or wanting to play a self-healing weapon master and rolling an empath (before construct hunting).

While in some convoluted way these things may be possible, in the end the most likely result is frustration.

This message was originally posted in The Social Side of DragonRealms (43) \ Conflicts - Strictly Out of Character (7), by DR-RAESH on the play.net forums.