elanthipedia talk:Projects: Difference between revisions
(Spells) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I finished updating the bestiary and went ahead and changed the project entry here. I hope that's ok. --[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 00:31, 27 March 2007 (CDT) |
I finished updating the bestiary and went ahead and changed the project entry here. I hope that's ok. --[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 00:31, 27 March 2007 (CDT) |
||
:Perfectly ok! Thanks for the work you did. I think it looks great!--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] ([[User talk:Naeya|talk]]) 08:45, 27 March 2007 (CDT) |
:Perfectly ok! Thanks for the work you did. I think it looks great!--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] ([[User talk:Naeya|talk]]) 08:45, 27 March 2007 (CDT) |
||
== Spells == |
|||
The spell template with the infobox is excellent, however I propose taking the 'notes' field out of the template and making that part a normal wiki article section. In its current form it is cumbersome and anti-intuitive to edit the notes on a spell. This will become even more so if the notes field for a given spell grows larger than a few sentences. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 22:00, 27 March 2007 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 21:00, 27 March 2007
Guilds
I'm going to work up some infoboxes for the guilds, and I'm wondering what is the policy on using images from the Simu website? Specifically I was going to capture the guild illustrations for inclusing in the infoboxes. Farman 09:51, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
- Any official images I've been using I've been putting a tag on {{Simu Image}}. This can be added during the initial upload in the Summary field. I assume any usage is fine as long as it's notated (with the tag on the image itself). We aren't using it commercially, so it should be fine.
Bestiary
I finished updating the bestiary and went ahead and changed the project entry here. I hope that's ok. --Grindinghalt 00:31, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
- Perfectly ok! Thanks for the work you did. I think it looks great!--Naeya (talk) 08:45, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
Spells
The spell template with the infobox is excellent, however I propose taking the 'notes' field out of the template and making that part a normal wiki article section. In its current form it is cumbersome and anti-intuitive to edit the notes on a spell. This will become even more so if the notes field for a given spell grows larger than a few sentences. --Farman 22:00, 27 March 2007 (CDT)