Talk:Guilds: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Re: Including Race Percentages in Individual Guild Pages==
==Re: Including Race Percentages in Individual Guild Pages==
Race percentages are flexible and subject to change... I don't think there's any reason to include them. Thoughts? : [[User:Diarik|Diarik]] 09:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Race percentages are flexible and subject to change... I don't think there's any reason to include them. Thoughts? : [[User:Diarik|Diarik]] 09:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
:I think they were included because someone basically copy/pasted from the Official guild page. I have no clue when those were last updated. Frankly, I agree, and don't see a need to include them here.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] ([[User talk:Naeya|talk]]) 17:05, 24 March 2007 (CDT)


==Skills==
What about creating pages for each skill, and ways to train them?
What about creating pages for each skill, and ways to train them?


Already done, at least I've put in stubs. Check out [[:Category:Skills]]. [[User:Farman|Farman]] 17:01, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
:Already done, at least I've put in stubs. Check out [[:Category:Skills]]. [[User:Farman|Farman]] 17:01, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

:And to that end I'm taking out the section that lists individual skills, replacing with links to the Skillset categories. [[User:Farman|Farman]] 17:25, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

== Guild Abilities formatting? ==

I wanted to start updating the Bard guild pages, but realized that there isn't really a standard format for guilds and guild abilities. Do we want to make a format that can be used throughout, or should I just forge on with my editing? I like consistency, but would also like to get the information out there without having to edit all the other guilds pages to make it uniform! ~Slowhub
:Sorry about the late reply, Slowhub. Not sure if you still check this, but currently the guild pages are pretty much a rundown of basic info that can be gleaned from the official site, with a few extras. Go ahead and do whatever you like on the Bard page, and if you have any ideas about a better format for the pages, you won't need to worry about the other guild pages, I'm sure someone else can help make them uniform.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 00:48, 7 December 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 00:48, 7 December 2007

Re: Including Race Percentages in Individual Guild Pages

Race percentages are flexible and subject to change... I don't think there's any reason to include them. Thoughts? : Diarik 09:48, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

I think they were included because someone basically copy/pasted from the Official guild page. I have no clue when those were last updated. Frankly, I agree, and don't see a need to include them here.--Naeya (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

Skills

What about creating pages for each skill, and ways to train them?

Already done, at least I've put in stubs. Check out Category:Skills. Farman 17:01, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
And to that end I'm taking out the section that lists individual skills, replacing with links to the Skillset categories. Farman 17:25, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

Guild Abilities formatting?

I wanted to start updating the Bard guild pages, but realized that there isn't really a standard format for guilds and guild abilities. Do we want to make a format that can be used throughout, or should I just forge on with my editing? I like consistency, but would also like to get the information out there without having to edit all the other guilds pages to make it uniform! ~Slowhub

Sorry about the late reply, Slowhub. Not sure if you still check this, but currently the guild pages are pretty much a rundown of basic info that can be gleaned from the official site, with a few extras. Go ahead and do whatever you like on the Bard page, and if you have any ideas about a better format for the pages, you won't need to worry about the other guild pages, I'm sure someone else can help make them uniform.--Naeya (talk) 00:48, 7 December 2007 (CST)