Talk:Gorbesh Language (book): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "p...) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST) |
Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --[[User:Basselope|Basselope]] 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST) |
||
:I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST) |
|||
:I also agree... but I also think it is nice to separate sections into their separate letters so there is a Table of Contents with A-Z on it. --[[User:Kraelyst|Kraelyst]] 18:58, 19 November 2007 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:08, 17 March 2011
Regarding wikification: for the language books, is it necessary? In general, the function of these books is such that links to other topics will be minimal. So leaving the book inside "pre" tags is fine; nothing needs to be linked. Leaving things as they are also has the benefit of allowing editors to put their effort to more productive ends than (mostly pointless) formatting. --Basselope 18:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)
- I tend to lean towards thinking this way for the language books too.... it's a LOT of editing to put them into tables. It's actually easier for me to read in the pre tags. My 2 copper.--Naeya (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2007 (CST)
- I also agree... but I also think it is nice to separate sections into their separate letters so there is a Table of Contents with A-Z on it. --Kraelyst 18:58, 19 November 2007 (CST)