Template talk:Spell/old

Remove 'notes' field, split template

As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the "==Notes==" part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --Farman 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

Other problems

I've also noticed that for some reason if you append anything after the template call in an individual spell article, the text ends up as if it were within <pre> tags. I haven't yet figured out why this is, but it's a problem for future editors. --Farman 12:20, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Never mind this one... for some reason it was happening last night but it no longer is. :P --Farman 12:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Template Update

Farman, did you still plan on updating this template or want someone else to take a crack at it?--Naeya (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes, sorry about the delay. I intend to start looking at it this weekend. --Farman 14:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)

At long last I have completed the makeover. Check it out, take a look at a spell article using the new template, and tell me what you think! --Farman 05:13, 2 May 2007 (CDT)

New template in effect

I've changed over to the new template version and archived this one. --Farman 22:30, 5 May 2007 (CDT)