User talk:Naeya/Sandbox2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: ==looks nice!== Sorry for snooping, Naeya, but given your comment on the talk page I couldn't help taking a look. I like the new format of what you're doing, I've always thought our top p...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==looks nice!== |
==looks nice!== |
||
Sorry for snooping, Naeya, but given your comment on the talk page I couldn't help taking a look. I like the new format of what you're doing, I've always thought our top page was a bit boxy. But I do like having direct links to more things like we have now... I hope we can keep that. Maybe not everything we have now, but more than is shown on this sandbox version. Also are we big enough to have a featured article section? It's a lot of work to assess and organize articles for featured status, and I'd be surprised if we had more than 30 really superior articles at this point. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 23:01, 1 December 2007 (CST) |
Sorry for snooping, Naeya, but given your comment on the talk page I couldn't help taking a look. I like the new format of what you're doing, I've always thought our top page was a bit boxy. But I do like having direct links to more things like we have now... I hope we can keep that. Maybe not everything we have now, but more than is shown on this sandbox version. Also are we big enough to have a featured article section? It's a lot of work to assess and organize articles for featured status, and I'd be surprised if we had more than 30 really superior articles at this point. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 23:01, 1 December 2007 (CST) |
||
: heh This isn't anywhere near done yet, ya snoop! And I was just playing around with the featured article thing.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 23:25, 1 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
Revision as of 00:25, 2 December 2007
looks nice!
Sorry for snooping, Naeya, but given your comment on the talk page I couldn't help taking a look. I like the new format of what you're doing, I've always thought our top page was a bit boxy. But I do like having direct links to more things like we have now... I hope we can keep that. Maybe not everything we have now, but more than is shown on this sandbox version. Also are we big enough to have a featured article section? It's a lot of work to assess and organize articles for featured status, and I'd be surprised if we had more than 30 really superior articles at this point. --Farman 23:01, 1 December 2007 (CST)