Category talk:Articles that might reveal secrets: Difference between revisions
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:All quest information on both [[Aethereal Pathways]] and [[Familiars]] pages should be removed.--[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 07:47, 26 November 2007 (CST) |
:All quest information on both [[Aethereal Pathways]] and [[Familiars]] pages should be removed.--[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 07:47, 26 November 2007 (CST) |
||
The barrage ability or pathways themselves and what they do are not secret. If an article was written about them with the spoilers linked on a marked secret page is that acceptable? |
|||
== [[Barbarian]] == |
== [[Barbarian]] == |
||
Revision as of 19:51, 2 December 2007
Murrula's Flames
The reqs are listed in the Murrula's Flames article, but not revealed on the DR Spell page. I don't play a cleric so I don't know. Is that supposed to be secret? --Farman 21:51, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
- For both Murrula's Flames and Resurrection; the prereqs and the spells themselves are not secrets, only their quests are.--Aetherie 05:32, 17 June 2007 (CDT)
Resurrection
Same as for Murrula's Flames. DR Spell page shows req's as secret. --Farman 22:16, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
War Mage Pathways
The article contains what appear to be spoilers for the quests involved to attain those abilities. Is it fair to say that's still secret? --Farman 11:40, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
- All quest information on both Aethereal Pathways and Familiars pages should be removed.--Aetherie 07:47, 26 November 2007 (CST)
The barrage ability or pathways themselves and what they do are not secret. If an article was written about them with the spoilers linked on a marked secret page is that acceptable?
Barbarian
I am unsure if "Whirlwind" Req's are/should be considered secret. --Callek 23:56, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
- Players have posted on the barbarian boards the reqs. It is pretty common knowledge around the barbarian guild what the reqs are. I really wouldn't consider it a secret. --Brablo 21:42, 22 Oct 2007 (CDT)