Elanthipedia bugs: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:


In other words, if you click Discussion on {{ilink|w|gold-edged katar with a rainbow hematite hilt}}, it creates a page called [[gold-edged katar with a rainbow hematite hilt]] instead. --[[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT|talk]]) 22:28, 20 April 2015 (CDT)
In other words, if you click Discussion on {{ilink|w|gold-edged katar with a rainbow hematite hilt}}, it creates a page called [[gold-edged katar with a rainbow hematite hilt]] instead. --[[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT|talk]]) 22:28, 20 April 2015 (CDT)
:I noticed this as well, but noticed it on the advanced search page and only for certain namespaces. The namespaces that are missing talk pages specifically are: Armor, Item, Shield, Post, Weapon, and Title. File, Template, Form, Category, Help, Property, and User namespaces are functioning correctly as far as I can tell.--[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 22:44, 20 April 2015 (CDT)
:I noticed this as well, but noticed it on the [[Special:Search|advanced search]] page and only for certain namespaces. The namespaces that are missing talk pages specifically are: Armor, Item, Shield, Post, Weapon, and Title. The Concept, File, Template, Form, Category, Help, Property, and User namespaces all have Talk pages and are functioning correctly as far as I can tell.--[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 22:44, 20 April 2015 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:46, 20 April 2015

A place to list the current bugs in the server transfer.

Image Uploads

Thumbnails are not always being created/displayed. You can see some examples here. If you click what looks like a broken thumbnail, you can see the actual file. Deleting the image and then re-uploading it seems to fix it (as opposed to just uploading a new version). --ISHARON (talk) 01:11, 18 July 2014 (CDT)

Missing Page List

There may be a few maps that didn't make the pass, so please continue to update this page with them or leave a note on an Admin's talk page.

Missing maps
None currently. Yay!
  • Many corrupted tables and pages.
Corrupted Tables
Property:Noun is Wanted Pages Property:Rare item Property:Page type is

Item Searches

Many item searches do not work. Such as Cambrinth list.

Any search involving the namespaces Item, Weapon, Armor, Shield, or Post will be full of issues. I'm working on it as best I can, but it's turning out to be irritating. -CARAAMON (talk) 23:45, 1 July 2014 (CDT)
This is being investigated. Who's probably the Semantic Wiki expert, in case we have questions? --SIMU-NOVA (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2014 (CDT)
Insofar as we have one, that would be me. Which is kind of scary. -CARAAMON (talk) 08:24, 22 July 2014 (CDT)

Duplicate Search Results

There seem to be duplicate search results that pop up in the standard search. I've tried deleting some of them, which temporarily works, but they seem to repopulate themselves eventually. -CARAAMON (talk) 08:10, 22 July 2014 (CDT)

Semantic Failure on Custom Namespace

Any semantic data added to a custom namespace page (Item, Weapon, Armor, Shield, Post) after the server transfer does not register. Factboxes are also missing from the custom namespaces -CARAAMON (talk) 16:29, 13 April 2015 (CDT)

Weapon/Armor/Item Discussion Links Broken

Discussion links for links with prefixes like Armor:, Item: and so on remove that part of the link, causing anyone using them to create brand new pages instead of talk pages.

In other words, if you click Discussion on gold-edged katar with a rainbow hematite hilt, it creates a page called gold-edged katar with a rainbow hematite hilt instead. --TEVESHSZAT (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2015 (CDT)

I noticed this as well, but noticed it on the advanced search page and only for certain namespaces. The namespaces that are missing talk pages specifically are: Armor, Item, Shield, Post, Weapon, and Title. The Concept, File, Template, Form, Category, Help, Property, and User namespaces all have Talk pages and are functioning correctly as far as I can tell.--ABSOLON (talk) 22:44, 20 April 2015 (CDT)