Talk:Citizenship: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (→‎Formatting: new section)
Line 14: Line 14:


Not premium. It is possible premiums receive a 10% discount on cancellation fees. [[User:Shadowscribe|Shadowscribe]] 19:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Not premium. It is possible premiums receive a 10% discount on cancellation fees. [[User:Shadowscribe|Shadowscribe]] 19:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

== Formatting ==

So I'm thinking about condensing everything down to 2 tables: benefits, and costs (basically 1st table stays the same, the 2nd & 3rd would get combined.) Any thoughts or objections on this? I'd leave the verbage the same, but it would present a cleaner interface.

* See: [[User:Hithrael/Sandbox#Modified Citizenship Chart]]<br />
::[[User:Hithrael|Hithrael]] 21:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:16, 4 September 2009

Because it does seem hard to find, I am adding the room location that the Muspar'i citizen office is in: [Muspar'i, Shorka's Square] Stern yet matronly, Shorka's statue watches over her children and the other denizens of the sun's egg. Buildings, distinguished by the waveringly graceful banner of the city, stand welcoming and open to the people traversing the roads. Obvious paths: northeast, northwest

If we want to add locations for each office, it can be moved there at that time, but mostly is just being placed here for posterity purposes so it doesn't get lost. --Ysselt 13:09, 5 June 2008 (CDT)

Ilithi cancellation fees

Ilithi cancellation fee for Zaran in July, 2009 was 9000 Dokoras. Anyone else have recent info on cancellation fees for Ilithi?Shadowscribe 16:34, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Are you premium or not? I'm thinking perhaps there is a difference because of that. --Ysselt 19:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Not premium. It is possible premiums receive a 10% discount on cancellation fees. Shadowscribe 19:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Formatting

So I'm thinking about condensing everything down to 2 tables: benefits, and costs (basically 1st table stays the same, the 2nd & 3rd would get combined.) Any thoughts or objections on this? I'd leave the verbage the same, but it would present a cleaner interface.

Hithrael 21:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)