Post:Paladin Magic 3.1 - 11/14/2013 - 22:53 PM EST: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-RICINUS |t=Re: Paladin Magic 3.1 |d=11/14/2013 08:53 PM CST |n=2550 |f=The Paladins \ General Discussions |c=m |p=>why are we trading Evasion and Parry for Defend...") |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 21:37, 11 May 2014
| Re: Paladin Magic 3.1 · on 11/14/2013 08:53 PM CST | 2550 |
|---|---|
| >why are we trading Evasion and Parry for Defending and Reflex?
Because having an Evasion/Parry/Shield all-in-one spell was a bit too much defense boosting so we watered it down a little. | |
| This message was originally posted in The Paladins \ General Discussions, by DR-RICINUS on the play.net forums. | |