Category talk:Bestiary: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: been thinking about this, so tell me what you think as well: should categorize the bests a bit better, instead of like "young forest gryphon", it could be "gryphon, young forest" this way ...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
been thinking about this, so tell me what you think as well: should categorize the bests a bit better, instead of like "young forest gryphon", it could be "gryphon, young forest" this way we can get all the gryphons together, and goblins and trolls, and what have you... <br>
been thinking about this, so tell me what you think as well: should categorize the bests a bit better, instead of like "young forest gryphon", it could be "gryphon, young forest" this way we can get all the gryphons together, and goblins and trolls, and what have you... <br>
also i need help getting a link to the category:bestiary/level list on the actual bestiary page. i'm still very Wiki ignorant. The catalog thing could be done with level list i guess, but a lot of the creatures aren't on the official site where i got the information from. we'd need to place them where the might go... i know the what to hunt is a good indicator. ~ [[User:Yamcer|Yamcer]] 00:16, 19 May 2007 (CDT)
also i need help getting a link to the category:bestiary/level list on the actual bestiary page. i'm still very Wiki ignorant. The catalog thing could be done with level list i guess, but a lot of the creatures aren't on the official site where i got the information from. we'd need to place them where the might go... i know the what to hunt is a good indicator. ~ [[User:Yamcer|Yamcer]] 00:16, 19 May 2007 (CDT)
:Very good points, Yamcer. I'll touch on the bestiary categorization first. There is a way to leave the articles named as they are, but to have then placed into the category alphabetically by another letter, number or symbol. Using your example, [[Young Forest Gryphon]] could go into the category like so <nowiki>[[Category:Bestiary|Gryphon]]</nowiki>. In theory this should work perfect for those types of creatures. It will have to be worked from the Critter at a Glance template, I'll see if it can be done.

:The level list you created is great, it really is. I'd move it to just an article, and not a category like you have it though. Categories are more for the collecting of other categories and articles, and not for the purpose that I see of that list. If you like, move the data to a page titled perhaps... hmm [[Bestiary Level List]] or some such. Somewhere on the page (top or bottom doesn't matter), put in this text <nowiki>[[Category:Bestiary|*]]</nowiki>. That will put the list in the bestiary category and at the very top of the article listing too, since it will be categorized as the asterisk symbol, and not by it's article name. Also, you can edit [[:Category:Bestiary]] to put a link at the top to that article.

:Let me know if you have any questions about what I've replied here.

::--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 00:36, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 00:36, 19 May 2007

been thinking about this, so tell me what you think as well: should categorize the bests a bit better, instead of like "young forest gryphon", it could be "gryphon, young forest" this way we can get all the gryphons together, and goblins and trolls, and what have you...
also i need help getting a link to the category:bestiary/level list on the actual bestiary page. i'm still very Wiki ignorant. The catalog thing could be done with level list i guess, but a lot of the creatures aren't on the official site where i got the information from. we'd need to place them where the might go... i know the what to hunt is a good indicator. ~ Yamcer 00:16, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

Very good points, Yamcer. I'll touch on the bestiary categorization first. There is a way to leave the articles named as they are, but to have then placed into the category alphabetically by another letter, number or symbol. Using your example, Young Forest Gryphon could go into the category like so [[Category:Bestiary|Gryphon]]. In theory this should work perfect for those types of creatures. It will have to be worked from the Critter at a Glance template, I'll see if it can be done.
The level list you created is great, it really is. I'd move it to just an article, and not a category like you have it though. Categories are more for the collecting of other categories and articles, and not for the purpose that I see of that list. If you like, move the data to a page titled perhaps... hmm Bestiary Level List or some such. Somewhere on the page (top or bottom doesn't matter), put in this text [[Category:Bestiary|*]]. That will put the list in the bestiary category and at the very top of the article listing too, since it will be categorized as the asterisk symbol, and not by it's article name. Also, you can edit Category:Bestiary to put a link at the top to that article.
Let me know if you have any questions about what I've replied here.
--Naeya (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2007 (CDT)