Template talk:Spell/old

Remove 'notes' field, split template

As I mentioned on the project page, I think the 'notes' field should be removed, as I believe this is an unusual and non-intuitive way to edit a wiki article. Keeping the "==Notes==" part of the template (and perhaps adding other subsection headers) however is a good idea to maintain a consistent look to all spell articles. Then I suppose this template would be split into two parts: an infobox, and an article template that would be copy/pasted into new articles. --Farman 22:16, 27 March 2007 (CDT)