Post:Halt Discussion - 2/11/2010 - 14:43:06: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Post |a=DR-ARMIFER |t=Re: Halt Discussion |d=2/11/2010 2:43:06 PM |n=8948 |f=The Paladins (30) \ Magic Talk and Spell Ideas (11) |c=l |p=''>>1. I like halt and think reducing t…') |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 20:43, 11 May 2014
| Re: Halt Discussion · on 2/11/2010 2:43:06 PM | 8948 |
|---|---|
| >>1. I like halt and think reducing the duration was a mistake. Unlikely to be changed in light of the source of the change.
The duration of all disablers are going down. There's no plans to make Halt exceptionally short or long when the dust settles. >>Other guilds have no such prohibitions on their spell casting because they aren't Paladins. To me the question is really whether its fair that Paladins have this prohibition, not whether other guilds don't. In The Lorez, what's happening is that Paladins have more to lose when it comes to their souls -- a Paladin with a diseased soul is worse off than someone who never opened up his soul to the divine to begin with. The ongoing events will finally explain why. If this concept is aesethtically displeasing, you'll need to take it up with Dartenian and/or Chadatru. | |
| This message was originally posted in The Paladins (30) \ Magic Talk and Spell Ideas (11), by DR-ARMIFER on the play.net forums. | |