Talk:Gamgweth Grammar (book): Difference between revisions
DAEMETHEUS (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
DAEMETHEUS (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|+ Complex Sentence With Inflection uf'- |
|+ Complex Sentence With Inflection uf'- |
||
| Hentorke uf'bolg uf'mor vi Juli bolg uf' |
| Hentorke uf'bolg uf'mor vi Juli bolg uf'mor ve li gelvmor'seord uf'mor. |
||
| "A very bad Juli very badly traveled in the very dark cave" |
| "A very bad Juli very badly traveled in the very dark cave" |
||
| (travel-past badly greatly [very] a Juli bad very in the cave dark very) |
| (travel-past badly greatly [very] a Juli bad very in the cave dark very) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Already-Written Works with Inflection == |
|||
This makes use of the written work [[Lasadel ia Ulf (book)|Lasadel ia Ulf]] where understood (I have a talk translation on that page [[talk:Lasadel ia Ulf (book)|here]]). |
|||
=== Using -ue for Common -ly === |
|||
In the example Gamgweth sentence "Aevirke ulf lasadal ia bueserke wirue", the adverb is at the end with a -ue suffix. Where ''wir'' (evil) + ''-ue'' is likely intended to mean "evilly". Thus creating the translation: "The wolf saw the lady and smiled evilly". |
|||
Using that as a guide, the previous examples of ''uf'-'' to ''-ue'' would have the following effect on some sample sentences. |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
| Gwerke sannue Juli ri li trekhalosann. |
|||
| "Juli spoke well to the good chieftan" |
|||
| (speak-past good-ly [well] Juli to the chieftan-good) |
|||
|- |
|||
| Hentorke bolgue morue vi Juli bolg morue ve li gelvmor'seord morue. |
|||
| "A very bad Juli very badly traveled in the very dark cave" |
|||
| (travel-past bad-ly great-ly [very] a Juli bad very in the cave dark very) |
|||
|} |
|||
This is ideal for the purpose of finding a way to create adverbial forms. |
|||
== Other Issues == |
|||
=== Noun Adjectivication === |
|||
Turning nouns into adjectives, such as fire into fiery, or anger into angry, there are very few lexical examples to hint at a commonality. For instance, |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
! Noun (meaning) |
|||
! Adjective |
|||
! Change (if any) |
|||
|- |
|||
| elba (gloom) |
|||
| elban (gloomy [as opposed to "gloomily" adverb) |
|||
| -n |
|||
|- |
|||
| cambri (magic [n assuming]) |
|||
| cambri (magic [adj; as opposed to "magically"]) |
|||
| ''no change'' |
|||
|- |
|||
| ? (silence) |
|||
| ghazal (silent [as opposed to "silently") |
|||
| ? |
|||
|} |
|||
This is important as a distinction, because words in Common can change form when created as an adjective or adverb. Just because Common does it, doesn't mean that Gamgweth requires it, but take the case of ''aes'' for fire. |
|||
How does one define "Fire" the noun adjunct differ explicitly from "Fiery" the adjective as it is clearly seen in Common? |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
| maor aes zaul => "Fiery Devil Cat"? |
|||
| maor aeszaul => "Fire-Devil Cat"? |
|||
| maoraes zaul => "Devil Fire-Cat"? |
|||
|- |
|||
| maor zaul aes => "Fiery Devil Cat" or "Devil Fire Cat"? |
|||
| maorzaul aes => "Fire Devil-Cat" or "Fiery Devil Cat"? |
|||
| maor zaulaes => "Fire-Devil Cat"? |
|||
|} |
|||
While the distinctions may be clearer in written form, when Gamgweth is vocalized, the necessity for inflection should become apparent, yet there doesn't appear to be a general rule to assist with this process of distinguishing a noun from its adjective form. Take the difference between "the bony prince" and "the Bone Prince"; in Common, the nouns and adjectives are easy to understand. |
|||
=== Compounds === |
|||
When are words compounded? For instance, ''seordmaor'' (dark cat) is a compound of an adjective + noun; ''faldesu'' (long river) is the same. So when dealing with simple compounds the adjective ''usually'' should follow the noun, but either is acceptable. When multiple adjectives are applied, what then? Lets say the word is ''lunmor'' (boulder) and the comparison should be made against another object as a "big red boulder". Then the word would become ''lunmor mor talan'', or should it be ''lunmor mortalan'', or ''lunmormortalan''. Using the "dark green brook" example, ''faldban seord'telgi'', only the first adjective makes it onto the noun, while the rest follow compounded. |
|||
This ''seems'' to hold true for the most part, but there are a couple examples from that demonstrate otherwise (probably most commonly in names, and this seems to be acceptable). |
|||
= Basic Structure = |
= Basic Structure = |
Revision as of 17:27, 31 October 2016
What Is This?
This is mean to be a discussion of a lexical analysis that complements the grammar book. This is also intended to find out what modifications to the language should be make to clarify certain constructions whenever issues are noticed.
Proposals for Change
Adverb Adversity!
When an adverb exists, there is no place to put it clearly in the sentence. You can see this from below examples (spec. Example With Adjective vs. Adverb).
Why is this important? Well, adverbs play special roles in more complex sentences, modifiying both adjectives, verbs, and clauses. If we can't decide what it's modifying, then it will definitely lead to confusion.
Without Inflection
Esar ama gwer Gamgwethahle. | "I do speak beautiful Gamgweth" | (Do-pres I speak Gamgweth-beautiful) |
Esar ama gwer Gamgweth ahle. | "I do speak Gamgweth beautifully" | (Do-pres I speak Gamgweth beautiful) |
With Inflection
With inflections, the adverb could follow the verb or moved to the end of the clause.
- e.g., let's assume the inflection is uf'- (one of the least-found pairs)
Esar ama gwer Gamgwethahle. | "I do speak beautiful Gamgweth" | (Do-pres I speak Gamgweth beautiful) |
Esar ama gwer Gamgweth uf'ahle. | "I do speak Gamgweth beautifully" | (Do-pres I speak Gamgweth beautiful-ly) |
Gwerke Juli ri li trekhalosann. | "Juli spoke to the good chieftan" | (speak-past Juli to the chieftan good) |
Gwerke Juli ri li trekhalo uf'sann.
[don't do this, see below] |
"Juli spoke to the chieftan well"? | (speak-past Juli to the chieftan goodly [well]) |
Gwerke Juli ri li trekhalosann uf'sann.
[don't do this] |
"Juli spoke to the good chieftan well"? | (speak-past Juli to the chieftan-good well) |
Gwerke uf'sann Juli ri li trekhalosann. | "Juli spoke well to the good chieftan" | (speak-past well Juli to the chieftan-good) |
Uf'sann gwerke Juli ri li trekhalosann.
[could modify a clause?] |
"Juli spoke well to the good chieftan"? | (well speak-past Juli to the chieftan-good) |
Issues with Inflections
Hentorke uf'bolg Juli ve li gelvmor'seord uf'mor. | "Juli badly traveled in the very dark cave"?
"Juli very badly traveled in the dark cave"? |
- This suggests that the adverbs should be situationally near, and ordered, to the thing they are describing. Notice in the sentence below that the adverbs follow the thing they are describing, even adjectives. Never modifying from the end of a clause!
Hentorke uf'bolg uf'mor vi Juli bolg uf'mor ve li gelvmor'seord uf'mor. | "A very bad Juli very badly traveled in the very dark cave" | (travel-past badly greatly [very] a Juli bad very in the cave dark very) |
Already-Written Works with Inflection
This makes use of the written work Lasadel ia Ulf where understood (I have a talk translation on that page here).
Using -ue for Common -ly
In the example Gamgweth sentence "Aevirke ulf lasadal ia bueserke wirue", the adverb is at the end with a -ue suffix. Where wir (evil) + -ue is likely intended to mean "evilly". Thus creating the translation: "The wolf saw the lady and smiled evilly".
Using that as a guide, the previous examples of uf'- to -ue would have the following effect on some sample sentences.
Gwerke sannue Juli ri li trekhalosann. | "Juli spoke well to the good chieftan" | (speak-past good-ly [well] Juli to the chieftan-good) |
Hentorke bolgue morue vi Juli bolg morue ve li gelvmor'seord morue. | "A very bad Juli very badly traveled in the very dark cave" | (travel-past bad-ly great-ly [very] a Juli bad very in the cave dark very) |
This is ideal for the purpose of finding a way to create adverbial forms.
Other Issues
Noun Adjectivication
Turning nouns into adjectives, such as fire into fiery, or anger into angry, there are very few lexical examples to hint at a commonality. For instance,
Noun (meaning) | Adjective | Change (if any) |
---|---|---|
elba (gloom) | elban (gloomy [as opposed to "gloomily" adverb) | -n |
cambri (magic [n assuming]) | cambri (magic [adj; as opposed to "magically"]) | no change |
? (silence) | ghazal (silent [as opposed to "silently") | ? |
This is important as a distinction, because words in Common can change form when created as an adjective or adverb. Just because Common does it, doesn't mean that Gamgweth requires it, but take the case of aes for fire. How does one define "Fire" the noun adjunct differ explicitly from "Fiery" the adjective as it is clearly seen in Common?
maor aes zaul => "Fiery Devil Cat"? | maor aeszaul => "Fire-Devil Cat"? | maoraes zaul => "Devil Fire-Cat"? |
maor zaul aes => "Fiery Devil Cat" or "Devil Fire Cat"? | maorzaul aes => "Fire Devil-Cat" or "Fiery Devil Cat"? | maor zaulaes => "Fire-Devil Cat"? |
While the distinctions may be clearer in written form, when Gamgweth is vocalized, the necessity for inflection should become apparent, yet there doesn't appear to be a general rule to assist with this process of distinguishing a noun from its adjective form. Take the difference between "the bony prince" and "the Bone Prince"; in Common, the nouns and adjectives are easy to understand.
Compounds
When are words compounded? For instance, seordmaor (dark cat) is a compound of an adjective + noun; faldesu (long river) is the same. So when dealing with simple compounds the adjective usually should follow the noun, but either is acceptable. When multiple adjectives are applied, what then? Lets say the word is lunmor (boulder) and the comparison should be made against another object as a "big red boulder". Then the word would become lunmor mor talan, or should it be lunmor mortalan, or lunmormortalan. Using the "dark green brook" example, faldban seord'telgi, only the first adjective makes it onto the noun, while the rest follow compounded.
This seems to hold true for the most part, but there are a couple examples from that demonstrate otherwise (probably most commonly in names, and this seems to be acceptable).
Basic Structure
Alphabet
There are 24 Common characters used in Gamgweth (by example)
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P R S T U V W Y Z
- Notice there is no example of the Common letters Q or X used (though the vocals may exist in other combinations)
Punctuation
There are 4 (or 5) special characters used punctuation and are as follows:
Character | Usage |
---|---|
. | end of a declarative sentence. |
? | direct question at end of sentence |
, | separate ideas, elements, clauses (but not to separate adjectives) |
' (apostrophe) | indicate vocal stop (construed) between compounds where similar double consonants are paired; e.g., seord'telgi (dark green);
also used when inflecting verbs by adding -ing; e.g., gwelder (kill) -> a'gwelder (killing); may also be vocal stops |
! | (presumably) indicate emphasis in declarative or vocative sentence |
Other Parts of Speech
Articles
Definite (the) | Indefinite (a and an) |
---|---|
li | vi |
Prepositions
against | as | at | by | in | of | on | out of | to |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
gand | ev | ae | ha | ve | ai / rae | kus | diluai (construed) | ri |
Conjunctions
and | but | nor | or |
---|---|---|---|
ia | kho | uldin (construed) | ul |
Some Subordinating Conjuntions (others are already listed above)
"I was so scared that I ran away" (complement)
"I use that" (noun)
"I found it useful that I had the gold already" (sub conj) [arguable]
"It is on top of that table" (adjective)
- This is meant to illustrate that these words may are not well-defined; it may be right in Common reuse the same word in different ways, but it may not be the intended usage in Gamgweth.
how | than | that | when | where |
---|---|---|---|---|
lof | jen | padia | sudu | suren |
Compounds
General
Greater than
suffix -mor "great" to specify a greater amount/degree of a noun or adjective
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
chel | "cool" | chelmor | "cold" |
zindu | "house" | zindumor | "manor" |
sel | "sea" | selmor | "ocean" |
lermor | "gorge" | ||
gelv | "cave" | gelvmor | "cavern" |
Less than
suffix -ban "little" to specify a lesser amount/degree of the noun or adjective
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
sel | "sea" | selban | "bay" |
fal | "river" | falban | "creek/brook" |
lerban | "fissure" |
Area of type
remove end vowel and suffix -ren "land" to specify an area consiting of the type of noun or adjective
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
mod | "tree" | modren | "woodland" |
neflor | "train" | nefloren | "training ground" |
nama | "salt" | namadren | "salt flats" |
Full of, or filled with
suffix -ta "full"
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
crof | "bush" | croftan | "brush" |
selban | "bay" | selbanta | "cay" |
din | "no/not/zero" | dinta | "empty" |
av | "eye" | avtai | "stars" (see seordav "eclipse" [dark + eye]) |
Person of type (occupation)
suffix -ger "person"
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
tyval | "theft" | tyvalger | "thief" |
lasa | "noble" | lasager | "nobleman" |
Young type of thing
suffix -wen "young"
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
ger | "person" | gerwen | "child" |
andu | "day" | anduwen | "morning" |
lasa | "noble" | lasawen | "heir" |
night | "surmi" | (inflected) sumiwen | "evening" |
Construables
Negative type of thing
suffix -isi (construed "unwelcome/unwanted/dangerous/negative")
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
lort | "plant" | lortisi | "weed" |
dyr | "animal" (construed) | dyrisi | "beast" (see dyrgelv "den") |
Time of thing
suffix -dor (construed "time")
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
jeol | "ice" | Jeoldor | "Winter" |
anla | "sun" | Anlador | "Summer" |
sca | "before" (construed) | scador | "prepare" |
Questionables
- batar, dotar, hentar "left, right (dir), crossroad", hen "road"
- not sure how to interpret this...
Inflections
Adjectives
Compounding nouns with adjectives
Li denenshonarthe... | "The warm king..." | (the king warm) |
Sa li denenshon arthe. | "The king is warm" | (be-pres the king warm) |
Phopher li denenshona'phopher. | "The dreaming king dreams" | (dream the king dreaming) |
Adjectives to Adverbs (Common -ly)
No inflection of the adjective, simply add to end of the sentence to modify
- (assume Heyor == 'greet (v)' from Heyo "hello")
Heyor li denenshonchel Juli. | "The cool king greets Juli" |
Heyor li denenshon Juli chel. | "The king greets Juli cooly" |
- There's no rule for inflecting the adjective-to-adverb with -ly, so this I guess is considered contextually appropriate in this structure (see adjective adverbs below).
Make appearance of, make into (Common -en), suffix -(a)fi
Adjective | Meaning | Modified Adjective | New Meaning |
---|---|---|---|
rom | "broad" | romafi | "broaden" |
atila | "gold (metal)" | atilafi | "golden (metal)" |
Nouns
Verbification
If ending with a vowel, suffix -r
Noun | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|
phofe | phofer | "dream (v)" |
ferse | ferser | "sleep (v)" |
If ending with a vowel+consonant, replace consonant with -r
Noun | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|
achol | achor | "fear (v)" |
abues | abuer | "love (v)" |
If ending with a double-consonant, suffix -er
Noun | Modified Noun | New Meaning |
---|---|---|
gweld | gwelder | "kill (v)" |
Adjectification
Noun | Meaning | Modified Noun | New Meaning (Adjective) |
---|---|---|---|
elba | "gloom" | elban | "gloomy" |
Verbs
There do not seem to be infinitves with verbs (via examples), however there is ri (to) which may suggest it is usable to create them. However, it may also be intended to be preposition only and represents the Common use of the word, not necessarily proper Gamgweth usage.
Nominalization
TODO
Conjugations
Transitive Verbs
are modified by tense
Gweldke Juli li denenshon. TV S Det DO "Juli killed the king" (Kill-did Juli the king)
Intransitive Verbs
are modified only as a tense participle when using copulas (be)
Sa Juli a'gwelder. "Juli is killing." Cop S IV
Axiliary Constructions
Progressive Examples
progressives using transitive verbs, you may want to use auxiliary verbs for tense e.g., sa "be-present", sake "be-past", and saal "be-future"
past progressive
Sake li denenshon a'gwelder. | "The king was killing" | (be-past the king killing) |
Sake gaena a'gwelder. | "They were killing" | (be-past they killing) |
past progressive + past participle
Sake li denenshon a'sa gwelder. | "The king was being killed" | (be-past the king being kill) |
present progressive
Sa li denenshon a'gwelder. | "The king is killing" | (be-pres the king killing) |
Sa gaena agwelder. | "They are killing" | (be-pres they killing) |
present progressive + past participle
Sa li denenshon a'sa gwelder. | "The king is being killed" | (be-pres the king being kill) |
future progressive
Saal li denenshon a'gwelder. | "The king will be killing" | (be-fut the king killing) |
Saal gaena a'gwelder. | "They will be killing" | (be-fut they killing) |
Saal gaena a'tyvar urfe naen. | "They will be stealing all afternoon" | (be-fut they stealing afternoon all) |
present simple
Gwer tema Gamgweth? | "You speak Gamgweth?" |
Gwer tema Gamgweth | "You speak Gamgweth" or imperative "(You) speak Gamgweth" |
Sentences without copulas are not good, because there is not a distinction between the third person present tense and the second person imperative, "(You) kill Juli."
Gwelder Juli. | "Juli kills" or "Kill Juli"? |
Gwelder ama. | "I kill" or "Kill me"? |
Karke Juli gwelder. | "Juli has killed" or "Have Juli killed"? |
In this case, the default should imply the imperative is intended, and instead use modal conjugations when describing activities
Gwelderal Juli. | "Juli will kill" |
Gelderke Juli. | "Juli has killed" |
Use of modal esar (do):
Esar Juli gwelder. | "Juli does kill" |
Esar ama gwelder. | "I do kill" |
Esar tema gwer Gamgweth? | "Do you speak Gamgweth?" |
Esar ama gwer Gamgweth. | "I do speak Gamgweth" |
Example With Adjective vs. Adverb: This is where adverbs break down. See the following examples as to why adjective-to-adverb constructions don't necessarily work.
Esar ama gwer Gamgwethahle. | "I do speak beautiful Gamgweth" | Do-pres I speak Gamgweth-beautiful |
Esar ama gwer Gamgweth ahle. | "I do speak Gamgweth beautifully" | Do-pres I speak Gamgweth beautiful |
- This can't necessarily go next to gwer (speak) as might an adjective for the same example way above without modals. i.e.,
Heyor li denenshon Juli chel. | "The king greets Juli cooly" | Greet the king Juli cool |
- In this example, heyor (greet; construed) would have to be modified, but then would become
Heyor chel li denenshon Juli. | "Cool greets the king Juli" | Greet cool the king Juli |
- The problem is that adverbs should be inflected to indicate they are indeed modifiers.
past simple
Esarke Juli gwelder. | "Juli did kill" | (do-past Juli kill) |
Gwelderke Juli. | "Juli did kill" (per grammar rule) | (kill-past Juli) |
future simple
Gwelderal Juli. | "Juli will kill" | (kill-fut Juli) |
Sa Juli hevor ri gwelder. | "Juli is going to kill" | (be Juli going to kill) |
- In the last example, it might be possible to drop the ri (to) as implied infinitive or preposition; since the word exists, it should probably be considered proper to add it, while dropping it would be more like slang.
Perfect Progressive Examples
use of kar sa "have + be" with tense participle verbs (-ing)
present perfect progressive
kar li denenshon sa a'gwelder. | "The king has been killing" | (has-pres the king be killing) |
|- | karfano li denenshon sa a'gwelder. | "The king could have been killing." | (has-pres-could the king be killing) |}
past perfect progressive
karke li denenshon sa a'gwelder. | "The king had been killing" | (has-past the king be killing) |
karkefano li denenshon sa a'gwelder. | "Thing king could have been killing" | (has-past-could the king be killing) |
future perfect progressive
karal li denenshon sa a'gwelder. | "The king will have been killing" | (has-fut the king be killing) |
--DAEMETHEUS (talk) 22:46, 27 October 2016 (CDT)