Template talk:Critter: Difference between revisions
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: These are only relevant (and visible) to [[Necromancer]]s. It's a [[Butchery ritual|butchery]] thing, relating to gathering parts for [[Risen]]. --[[User:TK-421|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421|talk]]) 15:27, 2 May 2021 (CDT) |
: These are only relevant (and visible) to [[Necromancer]]s. It's a [[Butchery ritual|butchery]] thing, relating to gathering parts for [[Risen]]. --[[User:TK-421|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421|talk]]) 15:27, 2 May 2021 (CDT) |
||
:: Ah hah! Thanks for the information. Glad I asked. I will leave those fields alone from now on. That is not an activity I partake in. Should I undo changes that I made? The selections may be wrong. --[[User:VMPHNTRD|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD|talk]]) 15:33, 2 May 2021 (CDT) |
:: Ah hah! Thanks for the information. Glad I asked. I will leave those fields alone from now on. That is not an activity I partake in. Should I undo changes that I made? The selections may be wrong. --[[User:VMPHNTRD|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD|talk]]) 15:33, 2 May 2021 (CDT) |
||
::: Probably, but it's not the end of the world if you don't. We're still trying to catalog which creatures generate what types of parts. The [[Butchery ritual]] page shows how these get used. --[[User:TK-421|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421|talk]]) 15:42, 2 May 2021 (CDT) |
|||
:::: Apologies, I undid my recent changes. And, I like the new field notes, "Necromancers care about this." --[[User:VMPHNTRD|VMPHNTRD]] ([[User talk:VMPHNTRD|talk]]) 21:48, 2 May 2021 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 20:48, 2 May 2021
I removed the fields for stats because, after extensive testing, creature stats are fairly variable. This combined with the fact I can't actually think of anything useful to do with the information, has led me to remove it. -Moderator Caraamon Strugr-Makdasi(talk) 19:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The manipulate calcs have changed, and the automatically populated "maintenance cost" for manipulation is no longer accurate. Is there a way to change that? For instance, the initial cost to manipulate a shalswar is 15 concentration, but the maintenance cost is ALSO 15, not 5, as populated by the template. Prime-Lorzelophia
- Give me the new equation and I'll update it. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 03:46, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I think there's something wrong with the poachable field in the template. Critters aren't showing up as poachable in the stealth attack box even when the value has been entered. --Cierst (talk) 00:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- When I have the mental energy, I'll look into it. If I haven't gotten back in a week or so, nudge me. I've probably forgotten. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 06:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
New Skinning Updates
I'm going to update the template to handle the new skinning options, but it's going to take me a little while. Hang in there. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 18:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Change in Alignment
I just got tired of the left floating tables screwing up the flow of long articles. So I've changed it. So there. Nah nah! -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 01:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Body Type2 and Size
Is there a way in game for a character to ascertain these attributes or is what to fill these fields with left to subjective player assessments? --VMPHNTRD (talk) 14:51, 2 May 2021 (CDT)
- These are only relevant (and visible) to Necromancers. It's a butchery thing, relating to gathering parts for Risen. --TK-421 (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2021 (CDT)
- Ah hah! Thanks for the information. Glad I asked. I will leave those fields alone from now on. That is not an activity I partake in. Should I undo changes that I made? The selections may be wrong. --VMPHNTRD (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2021 (CDT)
- Probably, but it's not the end of the world if you don't. We're still trying to catalog which creatures generate what types of parts. The Butchery ritual page shows how these get used. --TK-421 (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2021 (CDT)
- Ah hah! Thanks for the information. Glad I asked. I will leave those fields alone from now on. That is not an activity I partake in. Should I undo changes that I made? The selections may be wrong. --VMPHNTRD (talk) 15:33, 2 May 2021 (CDT)