Talk:Policy:Unique items: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
This policy does not specifically mention registration, which would be especially useful to include for new/ignorant players looking up replacement policy. I think the policy could also use more clarity in general. Under what circumstances (likely involving registration) is an item definitely going to be replaced, definitely not going to be replaced, and when is it up to GM discretion? Furthermore, while the updated GIVE mechanics are very welcome, I think there still needs to be a policy in place that prevents people from taking items from others without their consent. For example, if an item is given to another following a logged conversation in which the giver clearly indicates the item is on loan and not a gift, I think the giver should be entitled to report the theft to the GMs and have the item returned. Similarly, items dropped unintentionally (e.g. when an arm is cut off) should not be fair game to theft. --[[User:PRIMEQ|PRIMEQ]] ([[User talk:PRIMEQ|talk]]) 21:21, 3 September 2016 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:21, 3 September 2016
General Comments
Please keep discussion on this issue to the specific topic of the page title. Other Policy subjects can be discussed on the other appropriate policy pages.
ANYONE CONTRIBUTING TO THE POLICY DISCUSSION PLEASE READ: Do NOT edit or delete anyone else's contribution. Do NOT hold debates or conversations. You CAN edit your own contribution if you think of more to say. Make sure to add a signature to your contribution so it is easier to find. Click the signature button, second from the right at the top of the editing window. Finally... always make sure to preview BEFORE you save! Thanks! --BLADEDBUTTERFLY (talk) 00:38, 31 August 2016 (CDT)
Discussion
This policy does not specifically mention registration, which would be especially useful to include for new/ignorant players looking up replacement policy. I think the policy could also use more clarity in general. Under what circumstances (likely involving registration) is an item definitely going to be replaced, definitely not going to be replaced, and when is it up to GM discretion? Furthermore, while the updated GIVE mechanics are very welcome, I think there still needs to be a policy in place that prevents people from taking items from others without their consent. For example, if an item is given to another following a logged conversation in which the giver clearly indicates the item is on loan and not a gift, I think the giver should be entitled to report the theft to the GMs and have the item returned. Similarly, items dropped unintentionally (e.g. when an arm is cut off) should not be fair game to theft. --PRIMEQ (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2016 (CDT)