User talk:SARAGOS: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Hello. We see you're adding the latest First Herald to the wiki. Would it be possible for you to kee...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


We typically allow organizations and players one page for this type of thing, so each separate edition should not have its own page. Please let me know if you have any questions or need assistance merging the pages. --[[User:GAMERGIRL151|GAMERGIRL151]] ([[User talk:GAMERGIRL151|talk]]) 07:16, 10 March 2016 (CST)
We typically allow organizations and players one page for this type of thing, so each separate edition should not have its own page. Please let me know if you have any questions or need assistance merging the pages. --[[User:GAMERGIRL151|GAMERGIRL151]] ([[User talk:GAMERGIRL151|talk]]) 07:16, 10 March 2016 (CST)
:Thank you for archiving The First Land Herald to elanthipedia, but please refrain from making multiple updates to the page in one day when they can be made as one collective update. It disrupts the activity log and requires a lot more work on the moderator side when they're broken up like this. In other words, the content you're adding is fine, but they should be made as one big update instead of multiple small updates. --[[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT|talk]]) 12:40, 5 October 2016 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 12:40, 5 October 2016

Hello. We see you're adding the latest First Herald to the wiki. Would it be possible for you to keep the current edition on the same page as main article about the First Herald?

We typically allow organizations and players one page for this type of thing, so each separate edition should not have its own page. Please let me know if you have any questions or need assistance merging the pages. --GAMERGIRL151 (talk) 07:16, 10 March 2016 (CST)

Thank you for archiving The First Land Herald to elanthipedia, but please refrain from making multiple updates to the page in one day when they can be made as one collective update. It disrupts the activity log and requires a lot more work on the moderator side when they're broken up like this. In other words, the content you're adding is fine, but they should be made as one big update instead of multiple small updates. --TEVESHSZAT (talk) 12:40, 5 October 2016 (CDT)