Category talk:Heavenly Bodies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I'm leaning toward #1 or #2. Thoughts? --[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 09:10, 6 December 2007 (CST) |
I'm leaning toward #1 or #2. Thoughts? --[[User:Aetherie|Aetherie]] 09:10, 6 December 2007 (CST) |
||
:The constellations are one thing that really hasn't been touched since we transferred over from DRWiki. It just gave me a headache thinking about. However, I'm glad you brought this up now. I personally dislike the current naming, it's cumbersome and ugly, IMO. Like you, I'm leaning towards #1 or #2, probably more towards #2.--[[User:Naeya|Naeya]] <sup>([[User talk:Naeya|talk]])</sup> 10:16, 6 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
Revision as of 11:16, 6 December 2007
Constellations
I'd like to hear people's opinions about how to handle the constellations.
Currently, there is a Category:Constellations and a Category:Constellation. The former is the desirable category name but its contents are useless and will need to be deleted. The latter's contents are in a much better shape, but I think we should name the constellation pages differently.
- Phoenix constellation
- Phoenix (constellation)
- The Phoenix
- Constellation-Phoenix (as is)
I'm leaning toward #1 or #2. Thoughts? --Aetherie 09:10, 6 December 2007 (CST)
- The constellations are one thing that really hasn't been touched since we transferred over from DRWiki. It just gave me a headache thinking about. However, I'm glad you brought this up now. I personally dislike the current naming, it's cumbersome and ugly, IMO. Like you, I'm leaning towards #1 or #2, probably more towards #2.--Naeya (talk) 10:16, 6 December 2007 (CST)