Talk:Khurek: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What proof is there that Khurek is a Cleric, other than the circumstantial evidence that he is associated with Tallis and is the temple inquisitor? |
What proof is there that Khurek is a Cleric, other than the circumstantial evidence that he is associated with Tallis and is the temple inquisitor? |
||
:1. [[Inquisitor]] is a Cleric title. 2. Tallis isn't going to be giving an artifact from Karszen to just anyone, particularly one that can't leave the temple grounds. --[[User:Thilan|thilan]] 18:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC) |
:1. [[Inquisitor]] is a Cleric title. 2. Tallis isn't going to be giving an artifact from Karszen to just anyone, particularly one that can't leave the temple grounds. --[[User:Thilan|thilan]] 18:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
::Temple Inquisitor isn't a cleric title, and his title was "Inquisit," not Inquisitor. I would prefer to leave his guild "unknown" until it has been confirmed by more than circumstantial evidence. |
|||
--[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 21:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:04, 25 April 2009
What proof is there that Khurek is a Cleric, other than the circumstantial evidence that he is associated with Tallis and is the temple inquisitor?
- 1. Inquisitor is a Cleric title. 2. Tallis isn't going to be giving an artifact from Karszen to just anyone, particularly one that can't leave the temple grounds. --thilan 18:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- Temple Inquisitor isn't a cleric title, and his title was "Inquisit," not Inquisitor. I would prefer to leave his guild "unknown" until it has been confirmed by more than circumstantial evidence.
--Isharon 21:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC)