Talk:Front end: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was thinking about making a page for Lich as well, but I'm not really sure how to categorise it. |
I was thinking about making a page for Lich as well, but I'm not really sure how to categorise it. You can use it with Wizard or Stormfront, and its like a "skin" that fits over them and gives additional functionality. Thoughts on what to call it, exactly? --[[User:Ysselt|Ysselt]] 18:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
:That wouldn't be a front end but a third-party add-on that provides additional features. Perhaps it could be called a "utility," though that term is a little vague. --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 19: |
:That wouldn't be a front end but a third-party add-on that provides additional features. Perhaps it could be called a "utility," though that term is a little vague. However you classify it, I would name the article something other than just "Lich," as that is taken. --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 19:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:24, 9 February 2011
I was thinking about making a page for Lich as well, but I'm not really sure how to categorise it. You can use it with Wizard or Stormfront, and its like a "skin" that fits over them and gives additional functionality. Thoughts on what to call it, exactly? --Ysselt 18:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
- That wouldn't be a front end but a third-party add-on that provides additional features. Perhaps it could be called a "utility," though that term is a little vague. However you classify it, I would name the article something other than just "Lich," as that is taken. --Isharon 19:24, 9 February 2011 (UTC)