Talk:Chelia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Obviously the characters directly involved would generally have the most accurate information, but I don't think something like affiliations against provincial governments would be an item to not include in this article if factual completeness and accuracy is the question. |
Obviously the characters directly involved would generally have the most accurate information, but I don't think something like affiliations against provincial governments would be an item to not include in this article if factual completeness and accuracy is the question. |
||
Edited to add in signature, timestamp will be off but meh. |
|||
--[[User:Navak|Navak]] 04:30, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
:While I wasn't that specific in the other pages in the interests of brevity, I can be if that is your desire. If you would like to add the information yourself, why don't you instead of simply talking about it? It IS a wiki. [[User:Reene|Reene]] 04:27, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
:While I wasn't that specific in the other pages in the interests of brevity, I can be if that is your desire. If you would like to add the information yourself, why don't you instead of simply talking about it? It IS a wiki. [[User:Reene|Reene]] 04:27, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
||
I'd rather not add secondhand information for which I cannot personally observe the validity to the actual page. |
|||
--[[User:Navak|Navak]] 04:30, 2 December 2007 (CST) |
|||
Revision as of 05:30, 2 December 2007
If we're going to name specific names and events in other pages, it would behoove us to include information such as collecting and transporting arms for dragon priests, which is information to which Caelumia has access, in these pages as well.
Obviously the characters directly involved would generally have the most accurate information, but I don't think something like affiliations against provincial governments would be an item to not include in this article if factual completeness and accuracy is the question.
Edited to add in signature, timestamp will be off but meh. --Navak 04:30, 2 December 2007 (CST)
- While I wasn't that specific in the other pages in the interests of brevity, I can be if that is your desire. If you would like to add the information yourself, why don't you instead of simply talking about it? It IS a wiki. Reene 04:27, 2 December 2007 (CST)
I'd rather not add secondhand information for which I cannot personally observe the validity to the actual page. --Navak 04:30, 2 December 2007 (CST)