Post:Which is generally considered better for armor Absorption or protection - 04/24/2015 - 18:16

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 00:41, 25 April 2015 by ISHARON (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-KODIUS |t=Re: Which is generally considered better for armor Absorption or protection |d=04/24/2015 06:16 PM CDT |n=5247 |f=Combat - Weapons and Armor \ General D...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Re: Which is generally considered better for armor Absorption or protection · on 04/24/2015 06:16 PM CDT 5247
Yeah those points all seem reasonable. And TM skill is considered the "weapon" for such cases.


Absorb can also reduce the severity of a hit. But it cannot reduce a hit to 0 damage as easily as protection can.



"I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories instead of theories to suit facts."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes

This message was originally posted in Combat - Weapons and Armor \ General Discussions, by DR-KODIUS on the play.net forums.