Post:PROFILE, PVP Stance, and Consent - 1/9/2009 - 16:54:49: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (1 revision) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 21:37, 11 May 2014
Re: PROFILE, PVP Stance, and Consent · on 1/9/2009 4:54:49 PM | 4384 |
---|---|
Closed and Guarded are currently defined as informational, meant to inform other players about your preferences. Only the Open stance currently has policy considerations.
To that end, no, there's nothing stopping someone Closed from indulging in all forms of consent -- though it shows that the player is a habitual liar about his intentions, which in itself is useful information to have. | |
This message was originally posted in DragonRealms Policy Discussions (2) \ PvP combat policy (9), by DR-ARMIFER on the play.net forums. |