Talk:Origami

There are origami instructions for CROW instructions sold in Leth and Ratha. I have the ability, right now, to fold horses (395scholar/266mech/50int/46agil) and I fail miserably at Crow - any idea where these fall so they can possibly be added to the origami calculator? --Ysselt 16:33, 16 October 2008 (CDT)

Wasn't the Crow replaced by the Raven instructions because it had conflicts with the Crown instructions? --Mozzik 04:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know they're still sold (as of about 5 months ago when I bought some) they're also still available in origami grimoires. --Ysselt 19:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

New Origami References:

Would there be a way to combine both of these lists, so they're in full order? Perhaps a way to mark or colour the FEST patterns, so people know they aren't regularly available? --Ysselt 21:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Posts Regarding New Origami Patterns, finding your numbers (etc)

[1] - Gent's post with new origami information.

[2] - Gent's repost of Apu's original origami data.

Wrong First Folds

>read viper instr You read through the viper instructions and your eyes nearly cross. There are folds you've never heard of here, and you get a strong impression that trying this would be a waste of origami paper. You think it fairly obvious where the first fold would go. Roundtime: 3 seconds.

>read butterfly instr You read through the butterfly instructions and your eyes nearly cross. There are folds you've never heard of here, and you get a strong impression that trying this would be a waste of origami paper. You think it fairly obvious where the first fold would go. Roundtime: 3 seconds.

>read tri instr You read through the triquetra knot instructions and your eyes nearly cross. There are folds you've never heard of here, and you get a strong impression that trying this would be a waste of origami paper. Now if only you could figure out where to place the first fold. Roundtime: 3 seconds.

These aren't all the same level. Currently have 401 scholar + a prediction taking me to at least 500 + 50 int. Sadly I can't pin it down more to correct it. --Mozzik 04:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Posting your FF and SF might be a little more helpful; I personally don't understand the calculations but people like Gent do. You can get those numbers here: http://www.olwydd.org/systems/origamicalc.php SF is the first set FF is the second set. --Ysselt 19:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)