Talk:Swimming skill

I added a blank column to every list after the bottom cap. This fixes the layout problem that was keeping the top cap from displaying the proper information. My guess is that there is a better fix though, and when thats found my changes will cause things to break again. Someone will have to revert mine changes at that time.
--Foresee 13:40, 19 May 2008 (CDT)

Oh, hmm, thought I had fixed all the list entries. Because the What To Swim/Climb/Escape lists for climbing, swimming, and escaping were so similar in data I consolidated the former templates (for climbing and swimming, respectively) into one generic template. The only difference is that Climbing has that middle Weapon column, so for Swimming and Escaping I decided to hide it instead of listing a bunch of N/As or Unknowns. The blank column you put in is in fact supposed to be there, though, so you did good doing it the way you did.--Symphaena 17:08, 19 May 2008 (CDT)

With the new experience changes to swimming, the top caps have changed. I am still learning at 87 ranks in the Goblin Brook with one of my alts. Renian 06:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Reformatting

Any objections if these get reformated with a unified sortable list with an added field for province? Hithrael 22:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Swimming Times

With enough swimming, does the RT ever go away completely? I have 61 in swimming and and generally getting 1-3 seconds in Arthe Dale.

You can get it down to 1 second consistently, but you will never get 0 seconds. -Glimmereyes 18:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Observation

I believe swimming might now be on a fixed system by current and depth. Still shallow water appears to be all capping at 80-81. The bottom caps are most likely all ether 0 or something like 5 and the reason we are seeing different numbers is the characters that manage to have so few ranks have other things like burden preventing them from swimming. In this case we could clear up much of the swimming chart. It may be time to check the low level swimming with a naked commoner. Tell me what you think. --Be thatguy 21:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)