Template talk:Incomplete: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I rephrased the text and redid the graphics a little bit to make this template visually more in line with {{tlink|stub}} since they are in the same family. I did it primarily because I th...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I rephrased the text and redid the graphics a little bit to make this template visually more in line with {{tlink|stub}} since they are in the same family. I did it primarily because I think the visual disruption of the previous look was a bit too strong given the relatively minor flaw this template is meant to indicate. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 10:36, 19 April 2008 (CDT) |
I rephrased the text and redid the graphics a little bit to make this template visually more in line with {{tlink|stub}} since they are in the same family. I did it primarily because I think the visual disruption of the previous look was a bit too strong given the relatively minor flaw this template is meant to indicate. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 10:36, 19 April 2008 (CDT) |
||
:I think this template displaying a box is a little redundant. If someone is looking at an article it's pretty obvious what is missing, as the templates show a ? or 'Unknown'. And if someone is just looking for articles to complete, they can find that via [[:Category:Articles That Are Incomplete]]. Especially on articles that are mostly fleshed out and only missing on piece of critter or manip data, at best it looks clunky and at worst it causes formatting issues. --[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 19:56, 13 June 2008 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:56, 13 June 2008
I rephrased the text and redid the graphics a little bit to make this template visually more in line with {{stub}} since they are in the same family. I did it primarily because I think the visual disruption of the previous look was a bit too strong given the relatively minor flaw this template is meant to indicate. --Farman 10:36, 19 April 2008 (CDT)
- I think this template displaying a box is a little redundant. If someone is looking at an article it's pretty obvious what is missing, as the templates show a ? or 'Unknown'. And if someone is just looking for articles to complete, they can find that via Category:Articles That Are Incomplete. Especially on articles that are mostly fleshed out and only missing on piece of critter or manip data, at best it looks clunky and at worst it causes formatting issues. --Grindinghalt 19:56, 13 June 2008 (CDT)