Template talk:Title: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the tem...) |
(→Discussion links for this template are broken: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the template, this is because there used to be a Req1 - Req11. Does this mean we need to go through all the titles and make sure they use any available TitleReq formats? I've done [[Gypsy]], at least.[[User:FuIru|FuIru]] 06:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) |
It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the template, this is because there used to be a Req1 - Req11. Does this mean we need to go through all the titles and make sure they use any available TitleReq formats? I've done [[Gypsy]], at least.[[User:FuIru|FuIru]] 06:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Discussion links for this template are broken == |
|||
The Discussion link on any page based on the Item template page links to "<name>" instead of "Item_talk:<name>". - [[Padhg]] <sup>([[User talk:RY4NPW|talk]])</sup> 22:16 4 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:16, 4 December 2015
It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the template, this is because there used to be a Req1 - Req11. Does this mean we need to go through all the titles and make sure they use any available TitleReq formats? I've done Gypsy, at least.FuIru 06:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Discussion links for this template are broken
The Discussion link on any page based on the Item template page links to "<name>" instead of "Item_talk:<name>". - Padhg (talk) 22:16 4 December 2015 (UTC)