Talk:Amlothi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Amlothi was not visible on day 299 9 roisaen after the Anlas of Berengaria's Touch. |
* Amlothi was not visible on day 299 9 roisaen after the Anlas of Berengaria's Touch. |
||
- [[Padhg]] <sup>([[User talk:RY4NPW|talk]])</sup> 15:26 10 October 2015 (UTC) |
- [[Padhg]] <sup>([[User talk:RY4NPW|talk]])</sup> 15:26 10 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
::Two things. |
|||
::1. Kssarh lies a lot about the planets and constellations. I wouldn't rely on him, particularly about the planets. The blurb was likely from before the constellations and planets were given an overhaul. |
|||
::2. Planets are... different. They don't have set times like the constellations, but vary from cycle to cycle. I.e. they function like the moons but on a much larger scale. The time it rises this year isn't likely to be the same the next year or the next, and so on. |
|||
::I'm not sure how best to represent this using the template.--[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 17:11, 10 October 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 10 October 2015
Visibility
Kssarh then pulls you aside and instructs you on the planet Amlothi, which is visible during the Winter with the aid of a telescope.
- Amlothi was not visible on day 297 2 roisaen after the Anlas of Hodierna's Blessing.
- Amlothi was visible on day 299 13 roisaen before the Anlas of Berengaria's Touch.
- Amlothi was not visible on day 299 9 roisaen after the Anlas of Berengaria's Touch.
- Padhg (talk) 15:26 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Two things.
- 1. Kssarh lies a lot about the planets and constellations. I wouldn't rely on him, particularly about the planets. The blurb was likely from before the constellations and planets were given an overhaul.
- 2. Planets are... different. They don't have set times like the constellations, but vary from cycle to cycle. I.e. they function like the moons but on a much larger scale. The time it rises this year isn't likely to be the same the next year or the next, and so on.
- I'm not sure how best to represent this using the template.--ABSOLON (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2015 (CDT)