Post:Teaching Updates - 04/08/2015 - 19:44: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Post |a=DR-RAESH |t=RE: Teaching Updates |d=04/08/2015 07:44 PM CDT |n=1026 |f=Lore \ Teaching Skill |c=m |p=''>>Maybe I'm just misunderstanding, but that doesn't entirely m...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
-Raesh<br> |
-Raesh<br> |
||
<br> |
<br> |
||
*I think. I'm digging through several hundred lines of complex math I didn't write and no one cared to document when they were written 10-20 years ago, depending on which update the code is from) |
{{*}}I think. I'm digging through several hundred lines of complex math I didn't write and no one cared to document when they were written 10-20 years ago, depending on which update the code is from) |
||
<br> |
|||
"Ever notice that B.A.'s flavor text swells in direct proportion to how much one of our characters is getting screwed?" - Brian Van Hoose<br> |
|||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 20:14, 8 April 2015
RE: Teaching Updates · on 04/08/2015 07:44 PM CDT | 1026 |
---|---|
>>Maybe I'm just misunderstanding, but that doesn't entirely make sense to me. You say that this is the primary way the student's scholarship comes into play, but is it also the primary way the teacher's teaching is used? Because I wasn't just giving my student a scholarship boost; I was also giving myself one. What you're describing means that the boost to my student's scholarship was irrelevant, but unless that's the only place the teacher's teaching is used, shouldn't the boost to my own still have made a difference? And if that is the only place the teacher's teaching is used, that means that teaching effectiveness decreases with skill, which seems like particularly perverse design.
| |
This message was originally posted in Lore \ Teaching Skill, by DR-RAESH on the play.net forums. |