User talk:LADYSABLE: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TEVESHSZAT (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Just as an additional update to this, because we now have a siegery tag, there's no need to add the toy tag. --[[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT|talk]]) 15:07, 18 November 2014 (CST) |
::Just as an additional update to this, because we now have a siegery tag, there's no need to add the toy tag. --[[User:TEVESHSZAT|TEVESHSZAT]] ([[User talk:TEVESHSZAT|talk]]) 15:07, 18 November 2014 (CST) |
||
---Per [[Caraamon]], Siegery pieces and cases should be marked with a property of siegery and toy. the Itype for all of them is siegery. let me know if you have any issues Aislynn! - [[Linett]] 11-26-14 @ 8:15(est) |
|||
Revision as of 19:15, 26 November 2014
Hello!
Thank you for adding things on the Barrier incidentals!
In case you don't know, I just wanted to mention that when adding an item, you leave off the a, an, some part.
So like a lumpy old crow doll would just be lumpy old crow doll. :)
Thanks! Linett
siegery pieces
I've updated the item template to automatically make all items with the itype=siegery piece populate to the category:siegery piece page. There's no need to manually add it to each piece's page.--ABSOLON (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2014 (CST)
- Hmm... But they don't seem to be showing up on the category: siegery piece page now. 14:49, 15 November 2014 (CST)
- Just as an additional update to this, because we now have a siegery tag, there's no need to add the toy tag. --TEVESHSZAT (talk) 15:07, 18 November 2014 (CST)
---Per Caraamon, Siegery pieces and cases should be marked with a property of siegery and toy. the Itype for all of them is siegery. let me know if you have any issues Aislynn! - Linett 11-26-14 @ 8:15(est)