Talk:Xerasyth: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


:I posted what is known, with Seb's permission no less. You're free to clarify further within the article. We are not doing the Natashya song and dance again. [[User:Reene|Reene]] 18:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
:I posted what is known, with Seb's permission no less. You're free to clarify further within the article. We are not doing the Natashya song and dance again. [[User:Reene|Reene]] 18:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

This isn't about trying to hide information, Reene, it's about trying to make a clear distinction between what's known IG and what was acknowledged OOC so that more event information doesn't get delegated to the two or three people involved. I only put up what I did earlier as a courtesy to the person posting, because I don't like just changing people's stuff. If you rather I just edit your edits without talking to you about why I think there needs clarification or a change, I can do it that way. This information is part of things still going on, and not general in game knowledge at all. If you look at the posts that Seb's player and myself made about this on play.net, the fact that this is only OOC information is mentioned more than once. --[[User:Ignifera|Ignifera]] 18:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:50, 13 September 2009

We may want to add something, because information about Sebastienne and Ignifera helping Xerasyth is only knowledge from the forums. I'm afraid that by posting it here like this without any type of disclaimer, people will be apt to assume it is known in-game. While Khurek DID claim they helped (by SPYING only) on the Crossing gweth, its only speculation if that's true or not, and the article may want to reflect that as well (edited) Thoughts? --Ysselt 16:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

As the player of one of the characters in question, I'm personally not at all comfortable with the way this is currently worded. I think it doesn't delineate between the parts of the article that are known ICly and the parts (namely those involving my character and Seb) which are not known ICly. Like Ysselt was saying, the only thing that is known in game is that Khurek has accused Sebastienne and Ignifera of spying for Xerasyth on Sothavi's meeting in Shard regarding tactics to stop/kill him and the other Adan'f who had been invading Shard. If people feel the need to include information that is not known in game, it should be specifically identified as such, in order to keep people from making metagaming mistakes. To be honest, things like this make me all that more hesitant to post non-public event information. Please change it. --Ignifera 16:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I posted what is known, with Seb's permission no less. You're free to clarify further within the article. We are not doing the Natashya song and dance again. Reene 18:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

This isn't about trying to hide information, Reene, it's about trying to make a clear distinction between what's known IG and what was acknowledged OOC so that more event information doesn't get delegated to the two or three people involved. I only put up what I did earlier as a courtesy to the person posting, because I don't like just changing people's stuff. If you rather I just edit your edits without talking to you about why I think there needs clarification or a change, I can do it that way. This information is part of things still going on, and not general in game knowledge at all. If you look at the posts that Seb's player and myself made about this on play.net, the fact that this is only OOC information is mentioned more than once. --Ignifera 18:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)