Talk:Cambrinth: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This doesn't seem accurate. I was getting about 1 learning level per every few charges at 10 mana. I charged an orb a full 100 in one swoop and only gained 1 learning level. This makes it significantly less mana efficient since 10/charge is sustainable and 100/charge is not. |
This doesn't seem accurate. I was getting about 1 learning level per every few charges at 10 mana. I charged an orb a full 100 in one swoop and only gained 1 learning level. This makes it significantly less mana efficient since 10/charge is sustainable and 100/charge is not. |
||
:The key phrase being "without ruining your attunement." (I assume that by "sustainable" you mean not too taxing to your attunement.) --[[User:Isharon|Isharon]] 17:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:35, 9 July 2011
I'm playing a magic user for the first time in years, and I came to this page looking for:
+ The syntax to use cambrinth items.
+ How much mana certain run of the mill items hold. (Cambrinth ring, twisted cambrinth armband, cambrinth orb).
+ How many MD ranks to start using cambrinth.
+ How many MD ranks to start using cambrinth with only one hand (?).
+ How many MD ranks to start using cambrinth that is worn.
I didn't see any of this information here, so thought it might be a good candidate to add to this page, if anyone else sees the need.
Prime-Lorzelophia 18:20, 12 April 2008 (CDT)
Thanks for adding that information, Reene. Magic newbs such as myself rejoice. Prime-Lorzelophia 16:05, 16 April 2008 (CDT)
Currently, the most efficient experience gain per action for training arcana via cambrinth is charging your cambrinth with as much mana as you can without ruining your attunement.
This doesn't seem accurate. I was getting about 1 learning level per every few charges at 10 mana. I charged an orb a full 100 in one swoop and only gained 1 learning level. This makes it significantly less mana efficient since 10/charge is sustainable and 100/charge is not.
- The key phrase being "without ruining your attunement." (I assume that by "sustainable" you mean not too taxing to your attunement.) --Isharon 17:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)