Talk:100th Circle Moon Mage quest: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Also it's helpful to sign your talk page comments (by typing four tilde's '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''') to timestamp it and so other people following the discussion will know who's who. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 12:21, 22 February 2008 (CST) |
:Also it's helpful to sign your talk page comments (by typing four tilde's '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''') to timestamp it and so other people following the discussion will know who's who. --[[User:Farman|Farman]] 12:21, 22 February 2008 (CST) |
||
You bring some interesting points, I am fairly new to the Wiki world and Elanthipedia itself. I am still getting the hang of "chatting" here and I appreciate the pointers. I have no real problem with renaming the link. I do not know how to designate the page itself under the Category you had mentioned. I simply want people to have easy access to the information should they seek it. I HATE puzzles and any puzzles I can demistify, I will |
|||
[[User:Damian|Damian]] 23:31, 22 February 2008 (CST)Damian |
|||
Revision as of 23:31, 22 February 2008
Rename article?
This is a pure walkthrough as opposed to being an article that describes the quest, so I think it should be renamed "100th Circle Moon Mage Quest walkthrough".
The link on the Moon Mage page should also reflect this IMO. I'd do it now but I can't quite figure out an elegant way to indicate that. In the best case there would be a main article about the quest which gets a link from the guild page, then the walkthrough article would be linked from that. --Farman 23:32, 20 February 2008 (CST)
I sort of think that the top of the article denoting it as a spoiler ought to be enough, I suppose I could call the link "walkthrough" but it seems redundant
- I just think as a general rule the title of an article should match the content as accurately as possible. This article is a walkthrough, and has no other content besides the walkthrough, so we should call it a walkthrough. That lets people know what kind of article it is before they click. The {{spoilers}} tag is there to give an unmistakable visual marker and also to put the article in Category:Articles_that_Reveal_Secrets, so it's not a matter of one or the other.
- You are probably not aware but there has been a lot of discussion in the past here on Elanthipedia about how to handle IG secrets, so as not to reveal something to anyone casually browsing the site who might want to figure things out on their own. The consensus that arose from those discussions is that we lean towards going a little overboard in segregating and marking such articles.
- Also it's helpful to sign your talk page comments (by typing four tilde's ~~~~) to timestamp it and so other people following the discussion will know who's who. --Farman 12:21, 22 February 2008 (CST)
You bring some interesting points, I am fairly new to the Wiki world and Elanthipedia itself. I am still getting the hang of "chatting" here and I appreciate the pointers. I have no real problem with renaming the link. I do not know how to designate the page itself under the Category you had mentioned. I simply want people to have easy access to the information should they seek it. I HATE puzzles and any puzzles I can demistify, I will
Damian 23:31, 22 February 2008 (CST)Damian