Talk:Faenrae reaver: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well, someone reverted my change, but I would like to point out that, while the experience gain was very, very low, after just a few minutes in Faenrae Reavers, with 197 ranks of Parry Ability, I had a measurable increase of mindstate from Clear to Perusing. I have since confirmed this multiple times. Obviously, it is not much, but I found this information contributed to the completeness of the article. |
Well, someone reverted my change, but I would like to point out that, while the experience gain was very, very low, after just a few minutes in Faenrae Reavers, with 197 ranks of Parry Ability, I had a measurable increase of mindstate from Clear to Perusing. I have since confirmed this multiple times. Obviously, it is not much, but I found this information contributed to the completeness of the article. |
||
: It was not reverted because of what you added, but what you (accidentally?) deleted. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 02:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC) |
: It was not reverted because of what you added, but what you (accidentally?) deleted. -Moderator [[User:Caraamon|Caraamon Makdasi]]<sup>([[User talk:Caraamon|talk]])</sup> 02:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Woops, my bad. The Critter Form doesn't play well with the older formatting of the Critter Template. I find it easier alter the old format to the new one than re-add all the info so I reverted it. I'm usually better about keeping track of any other changes and putting it back in but apparently I slipped up this time.-[[User:Glimmereyes|Glimmereyes]] 02:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:13, 9 February 2011
Well, someone reverted my change, but I would like to point out that, while the experience gain was very, very low, after just a few minutes in Faenrae Reavers, with 197 ranks of Parry Ability, I had a measurable increase of mindstate from Clear to Perusing. I have since confirmed this multiple times. Obviously, it is not much, but I found this information contributed to the completeness of the article.
- It was not reverted because of what you added, but what you (accidentally?) deleted. -Moderator Caraamon Makdasi(talk) 02:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
- Woops, my bad. The Critter Form doesn't play well with the older formatting of the Critter Template. I find it easier alter the old format to the new one than re-add all the info so I reverted it. I'm usually better about keeping track of any other changes and putting it back in but apparently I slipped up this time.-Glimmereyes 02:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC)