Talk:Aesrela Everild: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "At what point does AE become effective enough to be worked into one's regular rotation? As yet I've found it to be equally effective to FF... making me prefer FF since it sim...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
At what point does AE become effective enough to be worked into one's regular rotation? As yet I've found it to be equally effective to FF... making me prefer FF since it simplifies things. [[User:KASHNA|KASHNA]] ([[User talk:KASHNA|talk]]) 17:44, 28 July 2016 (CDT)<br /><br /> |
At what point does AE become effective enough to be worked into one's regular rotation? As yet I've found it to be equally effective to FF... making me prefer FF since it simplifies things. [[User:KASHNA|KASHNA]] ([[User talk:KASHNA|talk]]) 17:44, 28 July 2016 (CDT)<br /><br /> |
||
:I know this is old and you've probably moved past, but for anyone that comes along, AE or FF are both fine (though I'd recommend FF since you get all the strikes "instantly") until you get FOU, then that should become your default training spell for TM. Reason being is it'll hit all 4 engaged mobs and then pulse and hit them again. [[User:RAISER|Ozban]] ([[User talk:RAISER|talk]]) 00:59, 18 January 2017 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:02, 18 January 2017
At what point does AE become effective enough to be worked into one's regular rotation? As yet I've found it to be equally effective to FF... making me prefer FF since it simplifies things. KASHNA (talk) 17:44, 28 July 2016 (CDT)
- I know this is old and you've probably moved past, but for anyone that comes along, AE or FF are both fine (though I'd recommend FF since you get all the strikes "instantly") until you get FOU, then that should become your default training spell for TM. Reason being is it'll hit all 4 engaged mobs and then pulse and hit them again. Ozban (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2017 (CST)