Template talk:Title: Difference between revisions
(New page: It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the tem...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the template, this is because there used to be a Req1 - Req11. Does this mean we need to go through all the titles and make sure they use any available TitleReq formats? I've done [[Gypsy]], at least.[[User:FuIru|FuIru]] 06:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) |
It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the template, this is because there used to be a Req1 - Req11. Does this mean we need to go through all the titles and make sure they use any available TitleReq formats? I've done [[Gypsy]], at least.[[User:FuIru|FuIru]] 06:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Discussion links for this template are broken == |
|||
The Discussion link on any page based on the Title template page links to "<name>" instead of "Title_talk:<name>". - [[Padhg]] <sup>([[User talk:RY4NPW|talk]])</sup> 22:16 4 December 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Obsolete Titles == |
|||
Executive decision: I've just depreciated the "Obsolete" banner from this template. The DR2 to DR3 transition was ages ago, and if we haven't updated all the titles by now... we're not going to. The odds of another major overhaul of the titles is low, and the confusion the banners are causing outweigh their benefit (particularly since the "new" flag isn't properly supported in [[Form:Title]]). --[[User:TK-421|TK-421]] ([[User talk:TK-421|talk]]) 00:39, 26 January 2021 (CST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:39, 26 January 2021
It seems most (if not all) of the calls to this template attempt to pass requirements as unnamed parameters, rather than using the TitleReq template call. Judging by the history of the template, this is because there used to be a Req1 - Req11. Does this mean we need to go through all the titles and make sure they use any available TitleReq formats? I've done Gypsy, at least.FuIru 06:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Discussion links for this template are broken
The Discussion link on any page based on the Title template page links to "<name>" instead of "Title_talk:<name>". - Padhg (talk) 22:16 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Obsolete Titles
Executive decision: I've just depreciated the "Obsolete" banner from this template. The DR2 to DR3 transition was ages ago, and if we haven't updated all the titles by now... we're not going to. The odds of another major overhaul of the titles is low, and the confusion the banners are causing outweigh their benefit (particularly since the "new" flag isn't properly supported in Form:Title). --TK-421 (talk) 00:39, 26 January 2021 (CST)