Category talk:Glyphs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Glyph order== |
|||
Is there a way to re-order the glyphs on the table so that the glyph of warding appears first? I tried looking at other tables to try and figure it out without any luck. It's a small thing but it's the only paladin glyph that doesn't appear in numeric order by circle. |
Is there a way to re-order the glyphs on the table so that the glyph of warding appears first? I tried looking at other tables to try and figure it out without any luck. It's a small thing but it's the only paladin glyph that doesn't appear in numeric order by circle. |
||
:Unfortunately, that's a byproduct of standard alphanumeric order. I.e. 5th comes after 50th and not before 10th. I'll try a couple hacks to see if I can do a workaround, however.-[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 15:47, 15 March 2015 (CDT) |
:Unfortunately, that's a byproduct of standard alphanumeric order. I.e. 5th comes after 50th and not before 10th. I'll try a couple hacks to see if I can do a workaround, however.-[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 15:47, 15 March 2015 (CDT) |
||
:Okay, done. I used the zero-width space to place it at the front of the sort order without affecting the visual alignment.--[[User:ABSOLON|ABSOLON]] ([[User talk:ABSOLON|talk]]) 15:55, 15 March 2015 (CDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:55, 15 March 2015
Glyph order
Is there a way to re-order the glyphs on the table so that the glyph of warding appears first? I tried looking at other tables to try and figure it out without any luck. It's a small thing but it's the only paladin glyph that doesn't appear in numeric order by circle.
- Unfortunately, that's a byproduct of standard alphanumeric order. I.e. 5th comes after 50th and not before 10th. I'll try a couple hacks to see if I can do a workaround, however.-ABSOLON (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2015 (CDT)
- Okay, done. I used the zero-width space to place it at the front of the sort order without affecting the visual alignment.--ABSOLON (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2015 (CDT)