Template talk:Item/new

considering the VAST majority of item differences, I'm inclined to simply do templates for "each type" and not worry about trying to do an "everything" template.

And I'd rather give this some GREAT thought on how to organize, since yes Waered Pyramid is sold alot of places, but many things are not. How do we organize? --Callek 23:52, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

Eh, let's move the entire discussion back to Template talk:Item, it's going to get confusing talking about it in two places. --Farman 16:05, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

OK sorry for the confusion but I moved the whole thing to the Template namespace, let's discuss here.

My idea is something very simple with only the basic information that is common to all items; look and tap, cost/app value, weight, where to buy or obtain.

I think having a single 'top-level' template is better than several different ones since that will give consistency to item articles and make it easier to manage existing articles as well as easier to add new articles. Sub-type items such as weapons or whathaveyou could get a separate additional infobox with appropriate specific extra information. That would look nicer as well IMO.

I agree though, how to categorize will require some thought. We should keep it as general as possible and very very simple. At a certain critical mass I find that over-categorization makes things more confusing as opposed to less so, and can be counter-productive. But here's a quick list off the top of my head:

• Weapon
• Armor
• Fluff
  • Clothing
    • Pocketed
  • Jewelry
• Alchemy
• Fletching
• Tanning
• Forging
• Container
• Magic Item

Another thought is, there are zillions of items in the game and would it cause problems from a systems standpoint to have a huge number of little item articles? Is making a separate article for each item the correct way to go, or would it be better to have combined pages for shop items such as some of the shopping sites have? --Farman 16:35, 24 May 2007 (CDT)