User talk:Farman/spelltemplate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
(p.s. no need to migrate this talk page if you MOVE this page) |
(p.s. no need to migrate this talk page if you MOVE this page) |
||
:There you go snooping on my |
:There you go snooping on my sandboxes again :P |
||
:As you might tell, I'm very much a beginner in wiki syntax so I'm not familiar with "leave blank". I've spent all night looking up CSS syntax and ParserFunctions, and I'm done looking at my computer screen tonight ;) |
:As you might tell, I'm very much a beginner in wiki syntax so I'm not familiar with "leave blank". I've spent all night looking up CSS syntax and ParserFunctions, and I'm done looking at my computer screen tonight ;) |
||
Revision as of 02:42, 2 May 2007
how about we go with the "leave blank" style for this, and simplify it (so case on YES doesn't matter)
targetted=yes (or blank/missing) scrollonly=yes (or blank/missing) held=yes (or blank/missing)
would imo make the template easier to "use". --Callek 01:37, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
(p.s. no need to migrate this talk page if you MOVE this page)
- There you go snooping on my sandboxes again :P
- As you might tell, I'm very much a beginner in wiki syntax so I'm not familiar with "leave blank". I've spent all night looking up CSS syntax and ParserFunctions, and I'm done looking at my computer screen tonight ;)
- The way the #ifeq's are set up, if the values for scroll, held, or target are anything but yes, it will interpret as a 'no', and the icon won't appear (nor category be set). Truthfully, I don't think it's such a big deal since I think anyone able to use the template in the first place will be able to fix a caps error if they do it wrong. If this is an easy thing to adjust, then by all means go ahead and do so. It'll give me an opportunity to learn what you're talking about. --Farman 03:22, 2 May 2007 (CDT)