Talk:Vicious warcat

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I was definitely hunting these somewhat comfortably with weapons etc in the 160s. That upper cap is still way too high but I'm not sure where to adjust it to yet. THAYET (talk) 19:03, 6 August 2015 (CDT)


Creature Drive

I agree with Thayet on this one, the top end cap is way off in terms of practical training. I was able to dabbling the sword, so the hard cap is still higher, but not any decent training. Lowering Cap to 240 so people do not think this is a monster that is well above their level when 220 trains horribly.

  • You are certain that it is not quite as strong as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is not quite as agile as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is not quite as disciplined as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is not quite as quick to react as you are. (30)
  • You are certain that it is not quite as conditioned as you are. (30)
  • Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a crocodile-skin buckler and a bastard sword, you are certain that the vicious warcat is definitely less skilled.
  • Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a bastard sword, you are certain that the vicious warcat is something that you'd kill quickly.
  • If you attacked with a bastard sword, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly. (209)
  • If you threw the sword at the enemy you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (188)
  • If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly. (220)
  • If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly. (220)
  • If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train somewhat poorly. (221)
  • If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train acceptably. (171)
  • If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train somewhat poorly. (203)

--FATBOY30269 (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2015 (CDT)