Edit PostTest: Post:Some SvS changes - 03/02/2015 - 15:04

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: editor.

Author (Forum Name):
Title:
Date and Time:
Post Number:
Forum:
Post:	''>>The only way I could see something like that being fair and fun for everyone is if every guild had at least some {{PRel\|Debilitation Spells\|debilitations}} powered off of a primary or secondary skill (e.g. roars worked off expertise, ambushes worked off of backstab, etc.) and the defense part of the contest were distributed where it made most sense.''<br> <br> Well, no. I am totally willing to let guilds live and die based on their skill set placement. Whenever someone suggests a Thief or Barbarian use a non-magic skill to power their let's-not-kid-ourselves-this-is-magical abilities, I counter-suggest giving Moon Mages generous +tohit +dmg bonuses to moonblades.<br> <br> Being exceptionally focused at smashing someone's face in ''should'' be worth approximately much as magical trickery. And if it isn't, that means we should address a fundamental design problem, not that we should make everyone equally focused at magical trickery.

Free text:

Summary:

This is a minor edit

Watch this page

Navigation menu