Post:Consent based on guarding someone. - 08/21/2011 - 00:34

Re: consent based on guarding someone. · on 08/21/2011 12:34 AM CDT	820
<So... joe shoots me... i attack him, bob guards, i kill bob... <I don't still have consent on joe for *shooting me*? The original question asked was if he still had consent for Joe having *stolen from him* which is what gave him consent in the first place. In your example, Joe is shooting you, which he wouldn't be doing if he had stolen from you, so apparently the initial wronged party is you, because Joe is attacking you. You would then try to defend yourself for the attack, but Bob's guard would interfere and in the process you would kill Bob -- and now we're back to the initial situation, which is that Joe still shot at you and you weren't attacking him, you were defending yourself. You still have consent on Joe for the original attack since you have not yet attacked, only defended. And on that note, I am going to bed. My eyeballs are bleeding. If questions remain, I'll get them tomorrow. :)
This message was originally posted in DragonRealms Policy Discussions \ PvP combat policy, by SIMU-RIEL on the play.net forums.