Template talk:Critter at a Glance: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Disease) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Information about the poison or disease the creature causes should be in the In Depth field anyway, so that should be sufficient I think. |
Information about the poison or disease the creature causes should be in the In Depth field anyway, so that should be sufficient I think. |
||
--[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 22:12, 25 March 2007 (CDT) |
--[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 22:12, 25 March 2007 (CDT) |
||
::Upon further thought, should there even be a poison field? Currently there are just two critters in the poison category, and only the ghoul so far that causes disease. Would it be better to just merge the poison and disease into Special Attacks, and elaborate in the In Depth section? I think so. |
|||
::--[[User:Grindinghalt|Grindinghalt]] 22:36, 25 March 2007 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 22:36, 25 March 2007
Disease
I was just updating Ghoul and noticed there was no Disease field. I am going to just combine it with the Poison field for the following reasons:
- The At A Glance list is already pretty cluttered, in my opinion.
- The number of critters that poison or disease is small enough that it's more efficient to combine them.
- To avoid having to go back and update all the critters (like is having to be done now with the Poison field now)
Information about the poison or disease the creature causes should be in the In Depth field anyway, so that should be sufficient I think. --Grindinghalt 22:12, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
- Upon further thought, should there even be a poison field? Currently there are just two critters in the poison category, and only the ghoul so far that causes disease. Would it be better to just merge the poison and disease into Special Attacks, and elaborate in the In Depth section? I think so.
- --Grindinghalt 22:36, 25 March 2007 (CDT)