Talk:Necromancer: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:: Thanks! I was planning to keep notes anyways -- It just made more sense to do it up here, so everybody could follow along. I took a first stab at the reorganization. I'll fiddle with it later, I'm sure. --[[User:Ogoh|Ogoh]] 17:34, 21 January 2008 (CST) |
:: Thanks! I was planning to keep notes anyways -- It just made more sense to do it up here, so everybody could follow along. I took a first stab at the reorganization. I'll fiddle with it later, I'm sure. --[[User:Ogoh|Ogoh]] 17:34, 21 January 2008 (CST) |
||
==Split?== |
|||
The Wiki threw a fit when I tried to incorporate the secrecy info about the Philosophers that armifer posted[http://www.play.net/forums/messages.asp?forum=20&category=26&topic=3]. It suggested we split the article because it's a little too large. I'm guessing we should create an individual article about the Philosophers and move the information about them there. Thoughts? --[[User:Herald|Herald]] 09:51, 23 March 2008 (CDT) |
|||
Revision as of 09:51, 23 March 2008
For the image, does someone want to grab the Necromancer guild crest from the DR Cafepress store? I would do it but I have to run... -Thilan 15:18, 18 December 2007 (CST)
- Done. --Ogoh 15:49, 2 January 2008 (CST)
Rewrite
Armifer's released enough information that the whole copying and pasting thing isn't viable any longer. I'm currently in the process of reorganizing and summarizing things into a proper article. --Ogoh 01:34, 21 January 2008 (CST)
- Thanks Ogoh. You've been doing a great job collecting all the disclosed information. --Aetherie 01:39, 21 January 2008 (CST)
- Thanks! I was planning to keep notes anyways -- It just made more sense to do it up here, so everybody could follow along. I took a first stab at the reorganization. I'll fiddle with it later, I'm sure. --Ogoh 17:34, 21 January 2008 (CST)
Split?
The Wiki threw a fit when I tried to incorporate the secrecy info about the Philosophers that armifer posted[1]. It suggested we split the article because it's a little too large. I'm guessing we should create an individual article about the Philosophers and move the information about them there. Thoughts? --Herald 09:51, 23 March 2008 (CDT)