Talk:Blacksmithing discipline: Difference between revisions

From Elanthipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


Analyzing the ingots produces zero results, so I have no way of telling how good the ingot is, how pure it is, or what its volume is. <br />[[User:Drtyprior|- drtyprior]] 07:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Analyzing the ingots produces zero results, so I have no way of telling how good the ingot is, how pure it is, or what its volume is. <br />[[User:Drtyprior|- drtyprior]] 07:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)



If there is more volume in the crucible, mech lore appears to move slightly faster. The difficulty doesn't seem to be any different. I don't have the skill to analyze for quality yet.
If there is more volume in the crucible, mech lore appears to move slightly faster. The difficulty doesn't seem to be any different. I don't have the skill to analyze for quality yet.
Line 19: Line 20:
Mixing steel (iron/coal in equal amounts) appears to take no more skill to produce an ingot. I'm getting the same messaging that I have been with any other ore. Likewise, mixing steel ingots together doesn't appear to make the task any more difficult.
Mixing steel (iron/coal in equal amounts) appears to take no more skill to produce an ingot. I'm getting the same messaging that I have been with any other ore. Likewise, mixing steel ingots together doesn't appear to make the task any more difficult.
<br />--[[User:Drtyprior|drtyprior]] 16:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
<br />--[[User:Drtyprior|drtyprior]] 16:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


Around 11 ranks in mech lore provided me my first successful analyze.

~ You roughly analyze the steel ingot and make a few observations.
<br />~ This appears to be a type of refined metal ingot that is of mediocre quality.

As expected, not the greatest quality. But an idea of what I'm holding is better than nothing. I wonder if the analyzes become more precise with better skill?
<br />--[[User:Drtyprior|drtyprior]] 16:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:58, 19 March 2011

Smelting

I plan on keeping a log of my brand new blacksmith's journey here. Let me know if you would prefer that I do it under 'my notes' or 'my talk'

Around 6 or 7 mech lore, I started seeing these results while mixing lead/copper into ingots.
~ Your experience in smelting metal ore begins to show in the finished work.
~ A scant few mistakes can be seen in the smelted metal.
~ Overall the work meets your expectations.

Before this, I was messing up terribly. Refining is still a no-go as well.

Analyzing the ingots produces zero results, so I have no way of telling how good the ingot is, how pure it is, or what its volume is.
- drtyprior 07:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


If there is more volume in the crucible, mech lore appears to move slightly faster. The difficulty doesn't seem to be any different. I don't have the skill to analyze for quality yet.

However, mixing refined ingots with unrefined ingots/nuggets - no matter the quantity - seems to take more skill than mixing purely unrefined goods. I'm assuming any time a refined ingot is involved, it uses that as the skill check's difficulty. This most likely ends up producing a lesser-quality ingot. That also makes being able to analyze different ingots even more important, as a refined ingot looks the same as an unrefined one to the untrained eye.
--drtyprior 16:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


Mixing steel (iron/coal in equal amounts) appears to take no more skill to produce an ingot. I'm getting the same messaging that I have been with any other ore. Likewise, mixing steel ingots together doesn't appear to make the task any more difficult.
--drtyprior 16:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


Around 11 ranks in mech lore provided me my first successful analyze.

~ You roughly analyze the steel ingot and make a few observations.
~ This appears to be a type of refined metal ingot that is of mediocre quality.

As expected, not the greatest quality. But an idea of what I'm holding is better than nothing. I wonder if the analyzes become more precise with better skill?
--drtyprior 16:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)