Talk:S'Kra Kor warrior (1)

From Elanthipedia
Revision as of 08:04, 17 October 2016 by TEVESHSZAT (talk | contribs) (TEVESHSZAT moved page Talk:S'Kra Kor Warrior (1) to Talk:S'Kra Kor warrior (1))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

You are certain that it is about as strong as you are. (34)
You are certain that it is about as agile as you are. (32)
You are certain that it is rather less disciplined than you are. (39)
You are certain that it is somewhat less quick to react than you are. (32)
You are certain that it is definitely less conditioned than you are.
Taking stock of its offensive abilities, and defending with a silversteel ceremonial shield trimmed in blackened moonsilver and a slim tyrium kaft inlaid with a dark grey Katamba's spire, you are certain that the S'Kra Kor warrior is definitely less skilled. (Shield = 231 Defending = 229)
Taking stock of its defensive abilities, and attacking with a slim tyrium kaft inlaid with a dark grey Katamba's spire, you are certain that the S'Kra Kor warrior is a harmless opponent. (Small Edge = 277 Melee Mastery = 315)
If you attacked with a slim tyrium kaft inlaid with a dark grey Katamba's spire, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably. (Small Edge = 277)
If you threw the kaft at the enemy you are certain that it would train very well, provided you can land a blow. (Light Thrown = 192 Missile Mastery = 207)
If you defended by parrying attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train rather well. (Parry = 233)
If you defended by evading attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train acceptably. (Evasion = 257)
If you defended by blocking attacks, you are certain that the enemy would train rather well. (Shield = 231)
If you attempted to beguile the enemy with tactics, you are certain that it would train rather well. (Tactics = 230)
If you attempted to debilitate the enemy, you are certain that it would train very well, provided you can affect it. (Debilitation = 188)
--HEXEDBYTHENET (talk) 18:52, 8 August 2015 (CDT)